Venus still most successful Slam player of the 2000s - TennisForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 06:51 AM Thread Starter
Most Loved Member
 
Kworb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 11,141
                     
Venus still most successful Slam player of the 2000s

After Wimbledon I made a thread showing that Venus had overtaken Serena again in the 2000s, and now that I've finally updated my spreadsheet with the US Open results I can bore/excite you again with lots of lists.

The point system I use is: 1R - 1p, 2R - 2p, 3R - 4p, 4R - 8p, QF - 16p, SF - 32p, RU - 64p, WON - 128p

Top 10 of the 2000s

1. Venus Williams - 1091
2. Serena Williams - 1076
3. Justine Henin-Hardenne - 775
4. Jennifer Capriati - 698
5. Lindsay Davenport - 681
6. Kim Clijsters - 556
7. Mary Pierce - 349
8. Martina Hingis - 345
9. Amelie Mauresmo - 308
10. Elena Dementieva - 287

Divided by amount of Grand Slams played

1. Serena Williams - 56.6
2. Venus Williams - 49.6
3. Justine Henin-Hardenne - 36.9
4. Jennifer Capriati - 36.7
5. Martina Hingis - 34.5
6. Lindsay Davenport - 34.1
7. Kim Clijsters - 27.8
8. Maria Sharapova - 23
9. Mary Pierce - 17.5
10. Svetlana Kuznetsova - 15

---

Entire Open Era

1. Chris Evert - 3944
2. Martina Navratilova - 3785
3. Steffi Graf - 3721
4. Monica Seles - 1817
5. Evonne Goolagong - 1810
6. Billie Jean King - 1755
7. Margaret Court - 1732
8. Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario - 1643
9. Martina Hingis - 1381
10. Venus Williams - 1310
11. Lindsay Davenport - 1275
12. Serena Williams - 1230
13. Hana Mandlikova - 1197
14. Gabriela Sabatini - 973
15. Jennifer Capriati - 946
16. Conchita Martinez - 883
17. Virginia Wade - 867
18. Mary Pierce - 816
19. Jana Novotna - 807
20. Justine Henin-Hardenne - 778
21. Helena Sukova - 690
22. Mary Joe Fernandez - 661
23. Kerry Reid - 653
24. Pam Shriver - 584
25. Kim Clijsters - 568

Divided by amount of Grand Slams played

1. Margaret Court - 78.7
2. Chris Evert - 70.4
3. Steffi Graf - 68.9
4. Martina Navratilova - 56.5
5. Evonne Goolagong - 54.8
6. Billie Jean King - 53.2
7. Serena Williams - 47.3
8. Martina Hingis - 46
9. Monica Seles - 45.4
10. Venus Williams - 39.7

---

Anyway, hope you find this interesting, let me know if you want to see the results for another time period or perhaps with a different point system.

2015 saviors of the WTA

KAROLINA PLISKOVA 46 76 64 DOMINIKA CIBULKOVA 62 36 63 LUCIE SAFAROVA 64 63
MARIA SHARAPOVA 64 63 FLAVIA PENNETTA 76 76 SERENA WILLIAMS 76 36 76
MARIA SHARAPOVA 63 62 SERENA WILLIAMS 36 64 62 ZARINA DIYAS 60 60 SERENA WILLIAMS 36 62 63
SARA ERRANI 75 63 ANASTASIA PAVLYUCHENKOVA 16 60 60 SIMONA HALEP 63 46 64 JOHANNA KONTA 64 60
Kworb is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 06:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Blonde_Ambition7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,559
                     
hmm very interesting

Meh♥


Blonde_Ambition7 is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 08:05 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Williams Rulez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Venus!
Posts: 20,610
                     
interesting tt jennifer has done so well! wow...

but how come serena had 56.6 then fell to 47.3 in e 2 lists? shouldn't it be e same?
ditto for venus

VENUS
Serena
Lindsay Jelena Maria

Mary : Monica : Svetlana : Sania : Jennifer : Amelie
Roddick : Grosjean : David : Djokovic
Williams Rulez is offline  
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 08:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,112
                     
Look at your list for the entire open era.
It is obvious that your point system is a failure in ranking the players.
Get another system.
However a real system may not give you the results you want.
Zauber is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 08:56 AM
Senior Member
 
terjw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,421
                     
The most successful slam player of any period is the player with the most slam titles in that period. In the event of a tie you can look at number of finals etc etc. The most successful slam player of the 2000s is undoubtedly Serena at the moment.
terjw is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 09:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Beat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Posts: 31,055
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by terjw
The most successful slam player of any period is the player with the most slam titles in that period.
absolutely.
one slam title is worth much more than two finals!


__________________

__________________

Beat is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 09:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Paneru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 22,129
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blonde_Ambition7
hmm very interesting
Indeed.
Paneru is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 11:02 AM
Senior Member
 
wateva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 18,794
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williams Rulez
interesting tt jennifer has done so well! wow...

but how come serena had 56.6 then fell to 47.3 in e 2 lists? shouldn't it be e same?
ditto for venus
the first one is made counting from 2000 onwards. the other one is counting all of their grnad slam appearances. correct?

Kim Clijsters always in my heart

For the latest match previews and analysis, follow my blog: http://wonderfulwta.blogspot.com/
wateva is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 11:21 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,797
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zauber
Look at your list for the entire open era.
It is obvious that your point system is a failure in ranking the players.
Get another system.
However a real system may not give you the results you want.
Moreover, the Slams didn't have complete 128 draws until what the the early 90s?

It's yet another poster with too much time on their hands; but hey, what the heck, it's a different perspective right?

Last edited by Jakeev; Oct 25th, 2005 at 11:34 AM.
Jakeev is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 11:24 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,489
 
It's one of these "look! look! i found another way of adding up numbers so that they show my fave player as the best!" thread.
borisy is offline  
post #11 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 11:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 44,593
                     
Nice for Vee...but 6 slams is still 6 slams and that is > 5 slams!

Always bet on black!
Can you handle the truth?
The truth:
Serena Williams: Greatest African-American tennisplayer in history
21 majors:6366


Official Prince of the Royal Court
bandabou is online now  
post #12 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 12:01 PM
.
 
Stamp Paid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 49,013
                     
Hasnt Venus played more slams post 2000 anyway?

So the only fair results are the ones in which you divided by the number of slams played, in which Serena is on top.

Nice try, though.


█████████████████ʘ
Stamp Paid is offline  
post #13 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 01:28 PM
Senior Member
 
vwfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,846
                     
Venus is the best of her era, no matter what the stats say!
And she'll be back. . .
vwfan is offline  
post #14 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 03:21 PM
Senior Member
 
venus_rulez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,348
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by borisy
It's one of these "look! look! i found another way of adding up numbers so that they show my fave player as the best!" thread.


Or one of those my favorite player isn't on top so I'm going to bitch and moan about the stats

RIDE OR DIE! Down for Venus Williams



[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]


I GOT 5 ON IT!!!!! VENUS WILLIAMS 5 TIME WIMBLEDON CHAMPION!!!!!
venus_rulez is offline  
post #15 of 15 (permalink) Old Oct 25th, 2005, 03:39 PM Thread Starter
Most Loved Member
 
Kworb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 11,141
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by borisy
It's one of these "look! look! i found another way of adding up numbers so that they show my fave player as the best!" thread.
Well the Williams sisters aren't my favorites at all, but I can't deny their accomplishments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zauber
Look at your list for the entire open era.
It is obvious that your point system is a failure in ranking the players.
Get another system.
However a real system may not give you the results you want.
Well, the list for the entire open era is definitely skewed in favor of those players who played more and those who could dominate in their time. It just shows it's not possible to adequately compare players of this generation to the one before it. But I still think the list is interesting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakeev
Moreover, the Slams didn't have complete 128 draws until what the the early 90s?
I think most Grand Slams had at least 64 players, even in the 70s, so they shouldn't be seen as lesser accomplishments than a Grand Slam today.

2015 saviors of the WTA

KAROLINA PLISKOVA 46 76 64 DOMINIKA CIBULKOVA 62 36 63 LUCIE SAFAROVA 64 63
MARIA SHARAPOVA 64 63 FLAVIA PENNETTA 76 76 SERENA WILLIAMS 76 36 76
MARIA SHARAPOVA 63 62 SERENA WILLIAMS 36 64 62 ZARINA DIYAS 60 60 SERENA WILLIAMS 36 62 63
SARA ERRANI 75 63 ANASTASIA PAVLYUCHENKOVA 16 60 60 SIMONA HALEP 63 46 64 JOHANNA KONTA 64 60
Kworb is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome