Could someone please explain… - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old Aug 27th, 2005, 11:14 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Marshmallow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: In Love...
Posts: 9,223
                     
Question Could someone please explain…

Could someone please explain the different surfaces to me. Hence, what kind of game suits a certain surface and why. For example – why (many people believe) Justine can beat Serena on clay, but not on hardcourts. Or why Wimbledon could be mauresmo’s best chance to win a slam. I have an idea, especially about clay, but not so sure about grass and hardcourts.

Any help most appreciated
Marshmallow is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old Aug 27th, 2005, 11:48 PM
Senior Member
 
king416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 318
                     
Hard courts - Quite fast surface and the ball bounces high so it favours flat hitting power players like Lindsay, Williams sisters etc. However, its not as fast as grass so there is room for a defensive, retrieving type of game. Slice is less effective on this surface unless executed perfectly, therefore the best players on this surface tend to utilise big groundstrokes rather than finesse touches.

Grass courts - Very fast courts, where the ball skids through the ball, meaning that often the player has to use a lot of topsin to lift the ball over the net. Rallies in grass courts are generally quite short, because the serve is strengthened by this surface, and players come to the net more. Grass is perhaps the surface which sees most variety, as there are various succesful tactics, because powerful groundstrokes skid through the grass quickly making them hard to retrieve but also the speed makes volleys very difficult to get to, thats perhaps why Mauresmo has a good record at Wimbledon.

Clay courts - The slowest surface and the clay itself slows down the ball dramatically making this surface the one which favours the consistent player and the retriever. Whilst winners are still possible, the slowness of the court makes retrieving much easier. Serves are also negated and more easily retrieved (thats why Davenport struggles at the F0). Also drop shots are used much more on this surface because the clay stops the ball and therefore they are much more difficult to get to. Clay courts generally suit quick and very fit players who can mix up play. Matches on this surface are generally the longest because of the increased length in rallies.
king416 is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2005, 12:20 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Marshmallow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: In Love...
Posts: 9,223
                     
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by king416
Hard courts - Quite fast surface and the ball bounces high so it favours flat hitting power players like Lindsay, Williams sisters etc. However, its not as fast as grass so there is room for a defensive, retrieving type of game. Slice is less effective on this surface unless executed perfectly, therefore the best players on this surface tend to utilise big groundstrokes rather than finesse touches.

Grass courts - Very fast courts, where the ball skids through the ball, meaning that often the player has to use a lot of topsin to lift the ball over the net. Rallies in grass courts are generally quite short, because the serve is strengthened by this surface, and players come to the net more. Grass is perhaps the surface which sees most variety, as there are various succesful tactics, because powerful groundstrokes skid through the grass quickly making them hard to retrieve but also the speed makes volleys very difficult to get to, thats perhaps why Mauresmo has a good record at Wimbledon.

Clay courts - The slowest surface and the clay itself slows down the ball dramatically making this surface the one which favours the consistent player and the retriever. Whilst winners are still possible, the slowness of the court makes retrieving much easier. Serves are also negated and more easily retrieved (thats why Davenport struggles at the F0). Also drop shots are used much more on this surface because the clay stops the ball and therefore they are much more difficult to get to. Clay courts generally suit quick and very fit players who can mix up play. Matches on this surface are generally the longest because of the increased length in rallies.
Thank you so much. I really appreciate that.
Marshmallow is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome