Your feelings on quality points
Just been thinking about quality points recently, men don't have them, and women do...do you think that makes sense? i guess since there tend to be a few less upsets in women's events it rewards a stellar result although in men's events a lot of times people just run through an easy section of the draw and fly up the rankings without really having a nice win...let me know how you feel!
another question i have...don't you feel bad for people like emilie loit at the 03 australian open who come SO close to beating a top player and get nothing for that effort...just cause they had a bad draw, do you think that getting sets of top players should be some sort of bonus points as well? personally, i don't believe you should get bonus points without winning the whole match since that is the whole point of tennis, sometime you win more games/points and don't win the match, it's the critical times during the match that make the difference...anyway, just some ideas that i had recently...
It will always be Arantxa, hall of famer! and martina hingis and kim clijsters - amazing legends
ana ivanovic and the italian girls, especially pennetta (forza azzurre! RG CHAMP FRANCESCA AND FINALIST SARA!)
aga, vika, sam, na in the next tier
NEVER say "I don't care who wins, I just want good tennis"