сιаусоυгт = ваd теппіs ? - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 01:07 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Geisha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,907
                     
сιаусоυгт = ваd теппіs ?

In the Qualifying Rounds of the French Open 2005:

Lourdes Dominquez Lino (11) def. Lioudmila Skavronskaia 6-1, 6-7 (9), 6-2 in two hours and one minute during the 1st Qualification Round. Lino hit 18 winners to 38 unforced errors. Skavraonskaia hit 26 winners to 79 unforced errors and 10 double faults!

Lenka Nemeckova has had a journey in her opening two matches. In her opening Qualifying match, Nemeckova defeated Canadian, Stephanie Dubios 1-6, 6-4, 10-8 in two hours and 36 minutes. Nemeckova hit nine double faults to only one ace. She also hit 19 winners to 58 unforced errors. Her opponent, Dubios, hit seven double faults to only two aces and 46 winners to 86 unforced errors. Lenka's second Qualifying match was also dramatic. She won 7-5, 0-6, 8-6 in two hours and one minute. Lenka hit zero aces to six double faults and 19 winners to 57 unforce derrors. Hana Sromova, her opponent, hit 30 winners to 58 unforced errors.

Clarisa Fernandez, former French Open semifinalist in 2002, defeated Laura Pous Tio 6-1, 5-7, 10-8 in two hours and 33 minutes. Clarisa hit 48 winners to 67 unforced errors and her opponent, Pous Tio, smacked 46 winners to 73 unforced errors.

My question is:

Does a claycourt produce bad tennis, no matter how well of a claycourter you are? Or, are these stats misleading and do not show how an actual player played?

Let them eat cake.
Geisha is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 03:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,898
                     
don't trust the winner/UE statistics too much. The criteria for what qualifies as an unforced error, is not standardized. Some of the statisticians are scoring every ball hit out of the court as a UE, while other stat keepers apply much more narrow standards.
vogus is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 05:53 AM
Senior Member
 
JenFan75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Officially Dead
Posts: 2,493
                     
I just think it reflects how a lot of clay courters try to force errors or draw errors from their opponents.
JenFan75 is offline  
 
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 05:56 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Gdańsk
Posts: 28,426
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by anniflava
In the Qualifying Rounds of the French Open 2005:

Lourdes Dominquez Lino (11) def. Lioudmila Skavronskaia 6-1, 6-7 (9), 6-2 in two hours and one minute during the 1st Qualification Round. Lino hit 18 winners to 38 unforced errors. Skavraonskaia hit 26 winners to 79 unforced errors and 10 double faults!

Lenka Nemeckova has had a journey in her opening two matches. In her opening Qualifying match, Nemeckova defeated Canadian, Stephanie Dubios 1-6, 6-4, 10-8 in two hours and 36 minutes. Nemeckova hit nine double faults to only one ace. She also hit 19 winners to 58 unforced errors. Her opponent, Dubios, hit seven double faults to only two aces and 46 winners to 86 unforced errors. Lenka's second Qualifying match was also dramatic. She won 7-5, 0-6, 8-6 in two hours and one minute. Lenka hit zero aces to six double faults and 19 winners to 57 unforce derrors. Hana Sromova, her opponent, hit 30 winners to 58 unforced errors.

Clarisa Fernandez, former French Open semifinalist in 2002, defeated Laura Pous Tio 6-1, 5-7, 10-8 in two hours and 33 minutes. Clarisa hit 48 winners to 67 unforced errors and her opponent, Pous Tio, smacked 46 winners to 73 unforced errors.

My question is:

Does a claycourt produce bad tennis, no matter how well of a claycourter you are? Or, are these stats misleading and do not show how an actual player played?
Nemeckova and Sromova are poor players. Lenka just doesn't have shot to finish the points like Nagyova.
Wojtek is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 05:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Shonami Slam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hiding in my bed
Posts: 8,796
                     
yeah, don't trust the count too much
but even if they are fair -
clay courts are SLOW. plain and simple. even tough hitter can't outhit on the surface. and so you have to really go for your shots if you want them to hit fast, and that produces alot of UE, as for the winners, the girls are fast enough to get to anything, so it has to be really on the line so it skids if you want it to be special.
just like grass produces more and fast balls, so does the clay courts demand more building to the point and accuracy if you want it to be a good shot.
besides - dropshot is the official claycourt winner, so the stats are lying :P

if you have nothing important to say, please do so in non-tennis forum. if you have something you think is important, but is actually rubbish regarding anything other than tennis - please do so in the non-tennis forum. if you have something tennis related to say, but it's actually "OMG, X player is so h0t!1" or "who has the biggest boobs on the wtatour" please do so in menstennisforum, under "wta forum". if you have something important, tennis-related and interesting to say please do so. No one in the world can understand how much tennis means to someone, except another fan.
Shonami Slam is offline  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 06:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Watching TV
Posts: 11,084
                     
I heard on this board that RG counts all errors as unforced ones!

~ JUSTINE ~

The real LADY of the Justine Philistines' Society™
Lady is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 09:07 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: With Dmitry
Posts: 12,882
                     
Never trust Winners/UE stats.

Even if a player has an easy ball and tries to smack it down the line and makes an error, that's not unforced.


Darop. is offline  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 09:23 AM
Senior Member
 
volta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Porto
Posts: 12,977
                     
well fo me it´s more like less ecxitement long rallies that normaly end with erros. Grass and Hard are better i think we have more those WOW shots.

Dominika Cibulkova
volta is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 09:25 AM
Senior Member
 
volta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Porto
Posts: 12,977
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by DADYO
Never trust Winners/UE stats.

Even if a player has an easy ball and tries to smack it down the line and makes an error, that's not unforced.
yeah we can´t trust on them

Dominika Cibulkova
volta is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 11:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Shonami Slam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hiding in my bed
Posts: 8,796
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sphenx
well fo me it´s more like less ecxitement long rallies that normaly end with erros. Grass and Hard are better i think we have more those WOW shots.
<sigh>
on the contrary!
serve bounces slow enough to give it a nice hit back, a few hits on at each other, someone goes down the line and the other cross courts it but it gets volleyed at the net, but the point still ain't over like in hard or grass!
the volley is hit back as a lob, to that the play must run back and this time is in the defensive position.
and don't forget the wonders of dropshot.

if you have nothing important to say, please do so in non-tennis forum. if you have something you think is important, but is actually rubbish regarding anything other than tennis - please do so in the non-tennis forum. if you have something tennis related to say, but it's actually "OMG, X player is so h0t!1" or "who has the biggest boobs on the wtatour" please do so in menstennisforum, under "wta forum". if you have something important, tennis-related and interesting to say please do so. No one in the world can understand how much tennis means to someone, except another fan.
Shonami Slam is offline  
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 01:24 PM
Senior Member
 
volta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Porto
Posts: 12,977
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shonami Slam
<sigh>
on the contrary!
serve bounces slow enough to give it a nice hit back, a few hits on at each other, someone goes down the line and the other cross courts it but it gets volleyed at the net, but the point still ain't over like in hard or grass!
the volley is hit back as a lob, to that the play must run back and this time is in the defensive position.
and don't forget the wonders of dropshot.
true but i like Grass and Hard court more.

Dominika Cibulkova
volta is offline  
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 01:27 PM
country flag SM
Senior Member
 
SM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 11,146
                     
ona slower surface naturally there will be more errors and less winners. its common sense.

Good luck to the Aussie and Balkan girls!
SM is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 01:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Shonami Slam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hiding in my bed
Posts: 8,796
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sphenx
true but i like Grass and Hard court more.
i remember as a child (i'm 18 years old) on the yearly vacation from school watching the final of wimbledon.
they used to broadcast it on our national telly, and a big "live!" thingy was in the top left part of the picture.
i remember thinking they are ripping us off cuz each year there is the same dude winning, so it must be the same game (of course, i am reffering to pete sampras).
it's one of my funny tennis stories
i was too young to really remember the names with too many intrest, just the green grass, the aces and serve-volley, the usual 2-3 hour play that pete won each time - i thought it was quite boring after a while and that people with more things to do in life that i did would probably hate it.
it took me some time before i started watching more than just that yearly final, and the surface that i found most fascinating was clay.
for me - it brings out the best in tennis as a sport.
all other surfaces have more to strength and speed in them, the technique on clay is the most important issue.

if you have nothing important to say, please do so in non-tennis forum. if you have something you think is important, but is actually rubbish regarding anything other than tennis - please do so in the non-tennis forum. if you have something tennis related to say, but it's actually "OMG, X player is so h0t!1" or "who has the biggest boobs on the wtatour" please do so in menstennisforum, under "wta forum". if you have something important, tennis-related and interesting to say please do so. No one in the world can understand how much tennis means to someone, except another fan.
Shonami Slam is offline  
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 01:45 PM
Senior Member
 
alfajeffster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: United States of America
Posts: 9,216
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shonami Slam
<sigh>
on the contrary!
serve bounces slow enough to give it a nice hit back, a few hits on at each other, someone goes down the line and the other cross courts it but it gets volleyed at the net, but the point still ain't over like in hard or grass!
the volley is hit back as a lob, to that the play must run back and this time is in the defensive position.
and don't forget the wonders of dropshot.
On the rare occasion that a girl does come to the net to volley, she nearly always gets passed, and the point stops there. It's one of the most unfortunate aspects of clay-court tennis: the footing as an attacking player is hitting the studder step to explode into the volley is so slippery that most players don't even attempt it. Even the attacking male players like Tim Henman and Patrick Rafter, who played pretty well on red clay, normally waited out the ralley and maneuvered their opponents with deft slice backhands before attacking and volleying.

There is nothing more beautiful than Evonne Goolagong in full flight moving across a tennis court.
alfajeffster is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old May 20th, 2005, 04:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: With Dmitry
Posts: 12,882
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shonami Slam
the technique on clay is the most important issue.
You're joking.

To play on clay your stamina and leg power has to be SOOOO high, or after 2 hours of play, your dead.


Darop. is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome