What two NON-WILLIAMS players should ESPN risk the money to show on tape delay? - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old Apr 8th, 2005, 04:25 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,722
                     
What two NON-WILLIAMS players should ESPN risk the money to show on tape delay?

First, I'd like to thank tennisIlove09 for the article from TennisWeek from I drew these facts. His thread --> http://wtaworld.com/showthread.php?p...54#post5232554

Couple interesting points in that article, leading to thread title.

Federer-Agassi drew better than Venus-Sharapova, but there's a lot less available audience on a Thursday afternoon than a Friday night. People have jobs. But Venus-Sharapova found a LOT of viewers.

A tape delayed women's match, at 12:40am, with the outcome known, actually pulled an audience only slightly smaller than the average. ESPN will probably attribute that to the enduring popularity of Venus and Serena, but I would encourage them to be a bit more open-minded. Certainly if scheduling dictates a Williams-Sharapova match (either Williams) is scheduled against an Agassi match, they ought to at least consider the late-night tape delay option.

But the real question is, what two non-Williams players should they take the monetary risk of a tape delayed broadcast?

Please understand, I mean show on tape delay, late at night, as opposed to not showing at all.

In making suggestions, please remain aware that ESPN doesn't are a lick about women's tenis, or sports in general, really. They're in it to make money. Vaidisova vs Kirilenko might really do it for YOU, but it would cost ESPN money, and the tour credibility. Very few people are tuning into that match at 12:40am when they already the score, who won, and have already read any articles written about it. I'D stay up to see Angela Haynes vs Shahar Peer on tape delay, and so would three other people. Not good enough.

On the other hand, Jennifer Capriati vs Maria Sharapova might draw a 0.2, maybe even a 0.3. That's a money making number.

Excerpts for article
Quote:
Federer-Agassi match on Friday night, April 1st was ESPN2's highest-rated match, drawing 590,000 households, followed by Thursday afternoon's clash between Sharapova and Venus Williams, which reached 512,000 homes.

Interestingly, the Williams sisters quarterfinal, which aired on tape delay on ESPN2 starting at 12:40 a.m. Eastern on March 30th generated a 0.4 rating in reaching 346,000 homes — a positive performance given the late-night start time on the East Coast and the fact that viewers already knew the result by the time the match was aired.

* ESPN2's Key Biscayne coverage reached an average of 394,000 homes

* ESPN's Key Biscayne coverage reached an average of 351,000 homes

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.

Last edited by Volcana; Apr 8th, 2005 at 04:57 AM.
Volcana is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old Apr 8th, 2005, 04:27 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 118
                     
I see this thread as becoming an ESPN hate thread very soon.
uNIVERSEmAN is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old Apr 8th, 2005, 04:55 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,722
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by uNIVERSEmAN
I see this thread as becoming an ESPN hate thread very soon.
Why? Seems to me ESPN is working in right direction. They're showin AI Friday, Saturday, Sunday. Nice for a Tier II. I just want them to jump in with both feet instead of sticking their (figurative) toe inthe water.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old Apr 8th, 2005, 05:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 118
                     
I didn't say it's a bad thing, ESPN F'ing sux!
uNIVERSEmAN is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old Apr 8th, 2005, 05:44 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 118
                     
my comments were based on their coverage of IW and Miami.
uNIVERSEmAN is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old Apr 8th, 2005, 08:26 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,722
                     
ESPN is what we got. If the NHL hadn't cancelled their season, we wouldn't have as much cvoerage as we do.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome