Is that the most impressive Miami tournament run? - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 06:48 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,863
                     
Is that the most impressive Miami tournament run?

Kim beat 4 top 10 players (2 of which currently hold majors) and a recent major semifinalist on her way to the title - all without losing a set. I can't imagine any run being more impressive.

What is the least amount of games a player has lost in winning this title? Kim has to be close to the record - and she had an extra match from most winners.

Prayed through the nights
felt so alone
suffered from alienation
carried the weight on my own
Had to be strong
so I believed
and now I know I've succeeded
in finding the place I conceived
jenglisbe is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 06:53 PM
Senior Member
 
No Name Face's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: nYc
Posts: 12,821
                     
I think it is one of the best runs. It would have been better if she defeated a Williams or Henin, but she did defeat Myskina, Dementieva, Momo, and Sharapova in a row. Major props.

ROCK ON:
elena dementieva, serena williams, caroline wozniacki, ana ivanovic
david nalbandian, rafael nadal, andy murray, gael monfils, jo-wilfried tsonga
No Name Face is offline  
post #3 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 06:57 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,863
                     
Considering Justine has been out for months and Venus hasn't done much over the past year, I don't see why she needed to beat them more than, say, Elena. A win over Serena would have been impressive, but I don't know if that holds this back from being the more impressive run here.

Prayed through the nights
felt so alone
suffered from alienation
carried the weight on my own
Had to be strong
so I believed
and now I know I've succeeded
in finding the place I conceived
jenglisbe is offline  
post #4 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 07:18 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Paris
Posts: 11,719
                     
It is, especially when you look at the scorelines

A man may fight for many things. His country, his friends, his principles, the glistening ear on the cheek of a golden child. But personally, I'd mud-wrestle my own mother for a ton of cash, an amusing clock and a sack of French porn.
E. Blackadder is offline  
post #5 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 07:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 23,436
                     
I think it probably is. She beat 3 of the top 5 and 4 of the top 6. Pretty damn good.

Petra Kvitova
Golovin-Dementieva-Likhovtseva-Beltrame-Benešová-Chakvetadze-Szávay-Paszek-Cirstea
Vera Zvonareva
Riding the 3AM Rollercoaster
selyoink is offline  
post #6 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 07:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,996
                     
it probably is..........certainly kournikova's run in 98' was very impressive as well......she beat 4 top ten players and took the first set off of venus in the final
Brooks. is offline  
post #7 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 07:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Nacho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madrid
Posts: 16,414
                     
I think Serena's run in 2002 was also very impressive:

QF [8] S. Williams def [3] M. Hingis 6-4 6-0
SF [8] S. Williams def [2] V. Williams 6-2 6-2
Final: [8] S. Williams def [1] J. Capriati 7-5 7-6

and of course Anna in 1998, beating 4 top 10 players (Monica, Conchi, Davenport & ASV) before losing to Venus in the finals

YULIYA BEYGELZIMER
Nacho is offline  
post #8 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 07:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: on a rock
Posts: 5,755
                     
Of course Serena playing in 2002 was a seeded player and had a first round bye.

To think that Kim has played 14 matches in a row and I think without losing a set, right? Pretty amazing run. I don't know if it can be duplicated when you factor in that she is coming off a nearly year long injury layoff.
starr is offline  
post #9 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 07:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,330
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by starr
Of course Serena playing in 2002 was a seeded player and had a first round bye.

To think that Kim has played 14 matches in a row and I think without losing a set, right? Pretty amazing run. I don't know if it can be duplicated when you factor in that she is coming off a nearly year long injury layoff.

She lost one set to Lindsay.
jbone_0307 is offline  
post #10 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 08:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,996
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbone_0307
She lost one set to Lindsay.
and one to conchita but still to lose only two sets is just
Brooks. is offline  
post #11 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 08:06 PM
Senior Member
 
gmak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,609
                     
Kim only lost 2 sets to Lindsay and Conchita...
her win against a red-hot Lindsay at Indian Wells was the best of them all...

Anna's run in 1998 was mighty impressive as well...

she beat Lucic, Seles, Martinez, Davenport, ASV and led Venus a set and a break before losing.

Sharapova
Azarenka Kerber
Pavlyuchenkova Sakkari Muguruza Goerges Wickmayer Halep Osaka Kleybanova Kuznetsova Shvedova Kasatkina Bencic Kanepi Svitolina Cirstea Tsurenko Vekic
Dementieva Clijsters Petrova
gmak is offline  
post #12 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 08:30 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,863
                     
Anna definitely had an impressive run, she she didn't win the tournament. Kim beat the same number of top 10 players, as well as a player who just reached the semifinal of a major on a similar surface. And she did it without losing a set. That's more impressive than Anna's run, though perhaps that doesn't matter.

What is the fewest amount of games someone has lost in winning the title?

Prayed through the nights
felt so alone
suffered from alienation
carried the weight on my own
Had to be strong
so I believed
and now I know I've succeeded
in finding the place I conceived
jenglisbe is offline  
post #13 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 08:32 PM
Veelieve!!!
 
Infiniti2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 29,148
 
Go to tennis corner.. There are some good stats over there.


Love Trumps Hate
Infiniti2001 is offline  
post #14 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 09:11 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 27,280
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenglisbe
I can't imagine any run being more impressive.
I believe there was some promising teenager in 1987 that won this tournament with a more spectacular fashion.
Kart is offline  
post #15 of 30 (permalink) Old Apr 2nd, 2005, 09:16 PM
Team WTAworld
Destroyer of the Ring
 
Mercury Rising's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 5,336
                     
It's definately impressive, this shows it too, from WTA site:



Kim Clijsters is just two matches from becoming only the second woman to complete the Indian Wells-Miami double, i.e. winning the Pacific Life Open and NASDAQ-100 Open in the same year. Steffi Graf was the first and so far only woman to achieve this feat since 1989 (when Indian Wells was added to the Tour calendar), and she did it twice! In 1994, the German legend won Indian Wells, defeating Amanda Coetzer in the final, followed by victory in Miami over Natasha Zvereva. Two years later in 1996, she repeated the dose with a win over Conchita Martinez in the Californian desert and Chanda Rubin in Miami. In 2000, Lindsay Davenport came close to replicating Graf's achievements, winning Indian Wells over Martina Hingis but falling to the Swiss Miss in the Miami championship match.
At No.133, Clijsters became the lowest-ranked woman to win a Tier I title when she claimed the Indian Wells crown nearly two weeks ago. However, should Clijsters (now ranked No.38) be victorious in Saturday's final, not only would she be Miami's lowest-ranked and first-ever unseeded champion, she would also be the first woman to complete the Indian Wells-Miami double since Indian Wells was promoted to Tier I status in 1997. Currently, the lowest-ranked woman to win Miami is Venus Williams, who was No.11 in the world when she won the first of her three titles in 1998.

To date, the lowest-ranked Miami finalist has been Judith Wiesner in 1990, who was No.28 in the world when she fell to Monica Seles.
Clijsters has carried her phenomenal form from Indian Wells to Miami. Of the four semifinalists, she is the only one yet to drop a set, blazing through her five matches for the loss of just 18 games (including wins over Top 6 players Dementieva and Myskina), less than any of the other semifinalists. Despite playing one more match than Mauresmo, V.Williams and Sharapova (having not received a first round bye like her seeded rivals), Clijsters is the only woman remaining in the tournament to have spent less than five hours on-court so far. Should she win the title, the Belgian would be the first woman since Gabriela Sabatini in 1989 to win seven matches to claim the NASDAQ-100 Open. In 1990, the 32 seeded players were granted first round byes for the first time, meaning No.6 seed Monica Seles needed only six wins to claim her first Miami trophy.




We are what we are - forever live or die
Don't tell me how to act - how to be - how to live
I am what I am from beginning to the end




Member of Justine Philistines' Society
Mercury Rising is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome