Changes to AER for 2005. Your thoughts? - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 2nd, 2005, 10:24 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Atrixo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 665
                     
Changes to AER for 2005. Your thoughts?

I'm not sure if everyone's aware that some changes were made to the AER for 2005. Nothing too drastic, but they seem to be "loosening" the rules a bit more again.

15 and 16-year olds each have one extra tournament allowed (9 & 11 total, respectively); while 17-year olds are allowed an extra two tournaments (15 total). 16 & 17-year olds are still allowed to apply for one to two extra tournaments, on top of that total.

The number of wild cards has been increased as well. 16-year olds get an extra one (4 total); and 17-year olds now have a maximum of eight wild cards in total.

14-year olds can now play in all levels of FED Cup competition. Also, it seems that they can receive a wild card into one Grand Slam. The WTA has removed that restriction for 14-year olds. Interesting development...

14 to 17-year olds are also allowed to enter in an unlimited number of exhibition/non-tour events now.

That's about it for the changes. So what does everyone think?
Atrixo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 2nd, 2005, 10:30 AM
Senior Member
 
JenFan75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Officially Dead
Posts: 2,493
                     
I think that they should elminate that thing completely.
JenFan75 is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 2nd, 2005, 02:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,252
                     
Considering how well young players are now doing, without burning out, maybe they should have left things as they were. We had two teen GS winners last year, so obviously no one's development is being hurt by the AER.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 2nd, 2005, 06:09 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,006
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volcana
Considering how well young players are now doing, without burning out, maybe they should have left things as they were. We had two teen GS winners last year, so obviously no one's development is being hurt by the AER.
GS winners yeah, but WTA & Co could have put Maria S. into lot more good use in order to milk more $$$ if there have not been restricting AER rules.
vutt is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 3rd, 2005, 01:22 AM
Senior Member
 
ktwtennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,338
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by vutt
GS winners yeah, but WTA & Co could have put Maria S. into lot more good use in order to milk more $$$ if there have not been restricting AER rules.
How long would they be able to do that if she burned out? You have to invest in the FUTURE...Well said Volcana.

Visit MONICA!

I am a sinner too!
Jesus answered and said to him[Nicodemus, a Pharisee],"Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again[of the Spirit/above], he cannot see the kingdom of God."--John 3:3

Good works can't save you from hell!! Jesus loves you and wants to be in your heart and mind!!!

I will worship Jesus forever!
ktwtennis is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 3rd, 2005, 01:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,252
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by vutt
GS winners yeah, but WTA & Co could have put Maria S. into lot more good use in order to milk more $$$ if there have not been restricting AER rules.
Somewhat irrelevant.

a) Sharapova played 19 tournaments last year. If the rules kept her from playing as much as Zvonareva or Petrova, I'm all for that. A seventeen year old isn't an adult.

b) The AER applies to thousands of potential WTA players. It's there because so many players burned-out and got injured so young. Not to mention all the money spent of prospective careers that never materialize. The AER is like the rankings. It applies to everyone, not just the people at the top. If the WTA makes a little less money now, but gets more, better and healthier players later, it'll make all that money and more back later.

With an AER, maybe Martina Hingis isn't in retirement due to injures. Maybe she doesn't log quite so many miles on her feet while the bones are still developing. Sure 1997 was a great year for the WTA. But wouldn't it have been better to have Hingis for 2003-2010?

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 3rd, 2005, 01:55 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 27,278
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volcana
We had two teen GS winners last year, so obviously no one's development is being hurt by the AER.
Yet.

I agree with you though that they should have left things as they were.

Still, I have little doubt that it will only be a matter of time before we see another great teen player burn out and the whole issue is revisited yet again.
Kart is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 3rd, 2005, 02:13 AM
A winner is me.
 
Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Victory Trail.
Posts: 11,118
                     
The AER for 17 year olds is pointless. Under AER Sharapova has played more tournaments that the world number one and two.

Lindsay Davenport|Elena Bovina|Marissa Irvin|Tatiana Golovin|Mary Pierce|Sesil Karatantcheva|Cara Black|Clarisa Fernandez
Andrew. is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 3rd, 2005, 03:50 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Atrixo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 665
                     
The funny thing is that most young players don't "burnout" from playing too many, professional tournaments. It's the insane number of junior tournaments they're allowed to play at the same time.

The ITF seems to think these rules are perfectly fine for juniors:

13-year olds can play a total of 10 tournaments; plus 4 if they can reach a top 50 rank in juniors.

14-year olds can play a total of 14 tournaments; plus 4 if they can reach a top 20 ranking in juniors.

15-year olds can play a total of 16 tournaments; plus 4 if they can reach a top 20 ranking in juniors.

16-year olds can play a total of 25 tournaments, period.

17-year olds have no restrictions as to how many tournaments they may enter.

They're just as much --- if not much more --- travelling, physical wear, etc... on the junior circuit, than a pro would ever have to deal with.

Why this contradictory, and hypocritical attitude by the WTA/ITF regarding juniors and pros.

Think about it. Because young players are greatly restricted in terms of how many pro events they can play; many probably feel increased pressure to perform well, knowing that the margin for error is very limited. If they can't play against pros --- gaining valuable experience --- they're reduced to entering a vast number of junior tournaments to get playing time. This can be greatly detrimental to promising players, who have excelled at the junior level, and have learned all that can be learned from that level. It isn't helping them any, by forcing them to remain static; and restricting them from making their own choice as to when they're ready to turn pro.

The ATP only places restrictions on 14 & 15-year olds. Once you turn 16, you can play an unrestricted number of tournaments. They don't seem to have a noticeable problem with "burnout". Plus, you have to factor in the notion, that boys physically develop LATER than girls. All this coddling of female players smacks of gender bias and sexism. Girls aren't capable of playing more than men at an earlier age; they just aren't ready mentally, or physically. Bullshit! A 16-year old girl is physically mature --- has reached adult height and weight --- and mentally ready to make that decision on their own. If people feel, 16-year old boys can; why not girls?
Atrixo is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old Jan 3rd, 2005, 05:08 AM
Senior Member
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 180,346
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volcana
Somewhat irrelevant.

a) Sharapova played 19 tournaments last year. If the rules kept her from playing as much as Zvonareva or Petrova, I'm all for that. A seventeen year old isn't an adult.
Thats cos the AER dont work by Calendar year
AER starts from one birthday till the next.

its down to you when you wanna play the tourns, early on after your b-day or save them till later or spread them out.

Good luck in 2016 to my favs*Kuznetsova*Sharapova*Kleybanova*Vesnina*Shvedova*Kulichkova*Kasatkina*
Pavlyuchenkova*Makarova*Diatchenko*Pivovarova*Gasparyan*Leykina*Zhuk*Potapova*Pervushina*AZARENKA *Govortsova
MINELLA TsurenkoAlize Lim*El Tabakh*Robson*Cirstea
*Juhaszova*Zanevska*Broady*Bouchard*
Cetkovska*Svitolina*
Pliskova's*Rus*Bellis*Soylu*Sibille*Uberalova*Eden Silva*
http://www.twitter.com/TheBoiledEgg
TheBoiledEgg is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome