Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under Carlos Moya
Here's my take.
I'm a huge Navratilova fan and have been since the late 1970s. For me she has the perfect mix of athletic and technical skills. I've never seen a better attacker and I've never seen a natural attacker perform better on clay.
I deeply admire and respect the games and achievements of all the tennis greats I've seen, from Court, King, Goolagong and Evert, through Graf and Seles to Hingis, Serena and Justine, to name only a few. It is futile to argue over who was better because we all know that tennis is a game of relatives between two players on a given day in a given place on a given surface, etc, etc. All we can say is that both Steffi and Martina are among the greatest players the game has ever know, each made a unique contribution to the sport, was the best in the world over a long period during her career and was capable of beating the other on a regular basis. We can say the same for Chrissie and Madge Court and for me those four are the top tier. Martina is the one whose game I personally admire the most and I don't care if other people have a different opinion - as long as they don't insult mine.
Traits Gandhi considered the most spiritually perilous to humanity.*Wealth without Work * Pleasure without Conscience
*Science without Humanity *Knowledge without Character
*Politics without Principle *Commerce without Morality
*Worship without Sacrifice