2001 Wins over Year End Top Ten Players - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 12:26 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,567
                     
Post 2001 Wins over Year End Top Ten Players

I've compiled the number of wins each of these players has against the year end top ten. That doesn't mean the player was top ten when they lost. It's means they are top ten now. Obviously, this does not favor players who get injured a lot. Tough.

Again, the associated number is simply total victories in 2001 over the CURRENT top ten.

16 Davenport<br />15 Williams, V.<br />14 Capriati

09 Williams, S.<br />09 Seles

06 Hingis<br />05 Clijsters<br />04 Mauresmo<br />03 Henin<br />02 Dokic

It looks amazingly reasonable as a ranking system.

[ December 19, 2001: Message edited by: Volcana ]</p>

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 02:41 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,704
                     
Post

Very Interesting... they are quite close to the original rankings and quite reasonable although no way should Serena or Monica be ranked higher than Martina. HEr results this year were overall better than theirs.

Venus still isn't No.1 <img src="wink.gif" border="0">

As expected Lindsay's consistent excellence was rewarded with top placing on this list.

Another interesting thread
Robbie. is offline  
post #3 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 04:07 AM
I'm so current, I'm tomorrow.
 
AjdeNate!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The City by the Lake.
Posts: 49,160
                     
Post

Thanks, Volcana for this list! <img src="smile.gif" border="0">
AjdeNate! is offline  
post #4 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 04:16 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Williams Rulez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Venus!
Posts: 20,610
                     
Talking

That's interesting. But we could divide it by the tournaments played and come up with another list.... the average number of top ten players played per tournament. That way, we could see the average strength of the draws faced by the players.

VENUS
Serena
Lindsay Jelena Maria

Mary : Monica : Svetlana : Sania : Jennifer : Amelie
Roddick : Grosjean : David : Djokovic
Williams Rulez is offline  
post #5 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 04:41 AM
I'm so current, I'm tomorrow.
 
AjdeNate!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The City by the Lake.
Posts: 49,160
                     
Post

<font size=3><pre><br />1 Venus 1.250<br />2 Davenport 0.941<br />3 Serena 0.900<br />4 Jennifer 0.778<br />5 Monica 0.600<br />6 Hingis 0.333<br />7 Mauresmo 0.250<br />8 Clijsters 0.227<br />9 Henin 0.143<br />10 Dokic 0.070</pre></font>

That's taking wins divided by events.

[ December 20, 2001: Message edited by: Seles ]</p>
AjdeNate! is offline  
post #6 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 05:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,295
                     
Post

Interesting.

But if you count Hopman Cup, which the ITF does in its head to heads, then Seles has 10 (a victory over Clijsters) and Hingis has 7 (a victory over Seles).

Also how does Capriati have 14? What am I missing?<br />1 over Seles<br />1 over Davenport<br />3 over Hingis<br />3 over Serena<br />0 over Venus<br />1 over Henin<br />1 over Clijsters<br />1 over Dokic<br />1 over Mauresmo

Adds up to 12
mishar is offline  
post #7 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 06:07 AM
A4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ithaca
Posts: 621
                     
Post

Someone please clue me in. How were Martina's results overall better than Serena's? I'd appreciate any enlightenment, and of course, I'm sure their respective winning percentages will be taken into account.

DON'T INSULT THE ALLIGATOR UNTIL YOU'VE FINISHED CROSSING THE RIVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A4 is offline  
post #8 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 06:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 1,010
                     
Post

lobbum, Capriati has at least 2 wins over Dockic, one in Berlin and another one in the summer (don't remember where). I don't know if there is another one missing.
Gandalf is offline  
post #9 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 08:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 1,865
                     
Post

Jennifer has beatipt"elena Dokic THREE times this year.

Mirjana Lucic : Australian Open doubles champ and back in Top 100

Jelena Jankovic : US Open finalist 2008 and World No. 1

Jennifer Capriati : 3 Grand Slams, Olympic Gold and World No.1

[center]Rafael Nadal : 10 Grand Slams, Olympic Gold and World No.1 [/center]
mn73 is offline  
post #10 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 08:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Mateo Mathieu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Cockatoo Island
Posts: 59,708
                     
Talking

Berlin, San Diego and New Haven was Jelena in Top 20 not 10!


Inspiration is for amateurs


Faves: Mona Barthel / Samantha Stosur / Roberta Vinci
Mateo Mathieu is offline  
post #11 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 10:28 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,704
                     
Post

A4, while this point is debatable and in reality both players had very similar years results wise I am willing to say that Martina had a better year overall than Serena. Although in those final 3-4 months as Serena tore quality fields apart and Martina wilted mentally and physically it made the decision more unclear.

The fact is that before August Serena had passed the quarterfinals of a tournament just once all year. Her confidence lifted in Canada but she still appeared past the quarterfinals in only 4 events all year. her statistics look like this:

TOURNAMENTS:10<br />WINS:3 FINAL:1 QF:6<br />While all her wins were in high quality fields and in high tier events, these are hardly the results of a top 5 player. (And before you argue Martina didn't win a Tier 1 event, I seem to recall Jelena Dokic also winning two Tier 1's this season, as Serena did - did she also have a better season than Martina <img src="wink.gif" border="0"> )

Serena fared well in grandslams, never falling before the quarters and then making that brilliant run at the US Open. But still in 4 Grandslams she went past the quarterfinals just once.

Martina had a year that by her standards was VERY mediocre but nonetheless it was a top 5 calibre season in which she contested 18 tournaments and fell before the semifinals just three times. Her results read impressively:

TOURNAMENTS:18<br />WINS:3 FINAL:3 SF:9 QF:2 EARLY ROUND:1

That is a high quality season, and her consistent excellence is demonstrated at the grandslams most of all, where she reached the semifinals in 3 out of 4 events, only Jennifer Capriati reached the semis at all majors.

While Serena held a better record overall in 2001 at the Grandslams (mainly due to Martina's first round wimbledon exit), Martina's appearance in 3 semifinals to serena's 1 (they both made 1 final) is enough for me to say that she performed to a higher quality at the grandslams overall.

And Martina held a 2-1 head to head record against Serena over the year.

Their winning percentages are also quite similar and both exemplary though Serena has a slight edge, Martina - 80% (81% if yout take out her very early retirement to Lindsay) and Serena - 84%. Slight edge to Serena, but she played thirty less matches.

The only other statistic that favours Serena is the higher calibre of her 3 wins over Martina's 3. But I do not believe that reasonably this makes up for all the semifinals and finals she DID NOT play in.

So while this is a tough call(even the computer saw it this wya as they are only 2 spots apart), and you can easily interpret these statistics in which ever way you wish to make an argument for Serena, I believe that Martina's Season while unspectacular by her standards was still the 4th best set of results on tour and that is the ranking slot in which she belongs at present.

[ December 20, 2001: Message edited by: tennisaddict ]</p>
Robbie. is offline  
post #12 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 10:44 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,567
                     
Post

AlexSydney - It's victories over the year-end top ten, regardless of where they weere ranked when beaten.

"Again, the associated number is simply total victories in 2001 over the CURRENT top ten."

Doesn't matter if they were top ten when they were defeated or not. I had a feeling that wasn't relevant, and I still don't think it's that important. Look how little it changes anything.

Williams_Rulez, Seles - I think all dividing by number of tournaments accomplishes is hiding the fact that Monica and Serena miss a lot of tournaments. That's been a fact of life for both of them since Serena came on tour.

Like I said in the first post, if they can't stay on the court, tough.

[ December 20, 2001: Message edited by: Volcana ]</p>

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #13 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 01:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: atlanta
Posts: 653
                     
Post

I think Venus' numbers are very telling as well as Monica's and Serena's just from the stand point of the number of tournaments they've played. I think the award for most outstanding performance at a tournament goes to Venus Williams for her performance at the Pilot Pen, beating Justine Henin, J. Capriati and L. Davenport, back to back to back in a span of 25 hours and then turn around and win the US Open. I don't think she fully got recognized for that feat. Who else on tour could have done that (maybe Serena).

To the poster who said Martina had a better year than Serena, I couldn't DISAGREE MORE after February of this Martina's year was all down hill. Her best tournaments were Sydney and the AO. Her two tournament wins in February were a joke, lets face it, and no disrespect to those she beat, but they were jokes. As far as both their performances at Grand Slams, yea Hingis made it atleast to the semi's before losing, but she lost to people who were ranked lower than she was, at least Serena lost to players who were all ranked ahead of her. Also look at the fact that Serena had 9 wins over year end top 10 players and only played in 10 tournaments and yet Hingis had only 6 and played in 18 tournaments. Now you tell me who's the better player and had the better year.

drsupreme
supremeross is offline  
post #14 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 09:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,704
                     
Post

Supremeross, martina may have been all down hill after the AO but she still was still making SF and F when Serena was falling in QF. Until Serena played 3 great tournaments at the end of the year this wouldn't have even been a question. And I don't think three tournaments jsutifies ranking her above Martina overall. If those three tournaments had been at the start of the year and she hadn't gone past a quarterfinal since, we wouldn't even conceive of her being ranked ahead of Martina. Due to the fact these Marvellous feets are fresh in your mind, as a martina's apparent "failures" it is easy to be clouded. AND this ISN"T about who is the best player, it IS ABOUT who performed better this year. As for Martina falling to players ranked below her at grandslams, that tends to happen when your number one <img src="wink.gif" border="0"> . And barring Wimbledon the quality of player that each lost to was very high. Martina lost to Jennifer twice, Serena once and Serena lost to Martina, Jennifer twice, and Venus. That isn't really an issue becuase they more or less lost to the same players at majors.

[ December 20, 2001: Message edited by: tennisaddict ]</p>
Robbie. is offline  
post #15 of 34 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2001, 09:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: atlanta
Posts: 653
                     
Post

Tennisattick, you're probably the only one who thinks Hingis had a descent year, I think Hingis would even tell you she had the crappiest year since what 1997 or 1996. Who did Hingis beat enroute to the semis of the FO or the semis of the USO? Exactly. And when Serena did beat Hingis at the semis of the USO she handed Hingis her worst loss ever at the USO. And I don't know if you actually watch tennis (I doubt it from your feeble argument) but for those who did watch that match at the USO between Serena and Hingis did anyone else notice that when Serena beat both Hingis and Davenport no one was suprised and the announcer never called Serena's victory over them an upset. It's like no matter what Serena's ranking is, it's expected that she'll beat both of those players. That said, again you're the only one who didn't think Hingis year sucked and now she doesn't even have the number one ranking to cling to and milk respect out of from her fellow players and commentators. Hingis is still a good player, but she slipped this year and that you have to admit.

drsupreme
supremeross is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome