#1 Ranking - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 07:21 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tennisIlove09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 44,073
                     
#1 Ranking

Is it possible for Lindsay to regain #1 at the Open instead of Momo/Myskina?
tennisIlove09 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 07:27 PM
A winner is me.
 
Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Victory Trail.
Posts: 11,118
                     
Very. If she wins San Diego and New Haven, she actually has a shot at it before the Open.

Lindsay Davenport|Elena Bovina|Marissa Irvin|Tatiana Golovin|Mary Pierce|Sesil Karatantcheva|Cara Black|Clarisa Fernandez
Andrew. is offline  
post #3 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 07:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,306
                     
yeah, that's quite a real possibility. go lindsay!
Hant Hant is offline  
post #4 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 07:32 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tennisIlove09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 44,073
                     
thanks Andrew
tennisIlove09 is offline  
post #5 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 07:32 PM
country flag CJK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 959
                     
It's been speculated for the past few days, and polls also indicated that many believe Juju can lose the #1 ranking in the next month.
CJK is offline  
post #6 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 07:55 PM
Senior Member
 
~Rachel~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,538
                     
According to my calculations, Amelie could actually become No.1 at Montreal if she reaches the final! This is because JuJu should be down to around 4204 points and Amelie is currently on 4031 points!

ALLEZ AMELIE!!!
~Rachel~ is offline  
post #7 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 07:58 PM
A winner is me.
 
Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Victory Trail.
Posts: 11,118
                     
Momo also loses QF points though.

Lindsay Davenport|Elena Bovina|Marissa Irvin|Tatiana Golovin|Mary Pierce|Sesil Karatantcheva|Cara Black|Clarisa Fernandez
Andrew. is offline  
post #8 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 08:00 PM
Serena's #1 Hater
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 19,725
                     
If that indeed happens, I'm sure will unoffically unretire.....

"He who finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favor from the Lord." -- Proverbs 18:22

"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard." -- Herb Brooks

"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." -- Muhammad Ali
darrinbaker00 is offline  
post #9 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 08:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,910
                     
Justine will be only 4204 after Montreal?
That means a win this week and SF next will be enough for Nastya
Nastyafan is offline  
post #10 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 08:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,096
                     
A numerical nightmare. San Diego is undecided but Momo is out. Lindsay I think has two LA sets of points still in her ranking which means she has fewer points than it looks like. Myskina I don't think has Canadian points in her ranking and can gain. Momo and Myskina can get olympic points that Lindsay can't. Then the US Open will throw all those points about........
fammmmedspin is offline  
post #11 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 09:14 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 822
 
Justine can never be at 4204. On Monday she'll have 4916 pts. Same for next week as LA points (0) come off the ranks. She'll lose her points from Montreal (401) only in 2 weeks, and then she'll still have 4515 pts.
Cookie is offline  
post #12 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 09:17 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Venus Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,233
                     
Let's not forget that Justine is NOT losing any points next week.

This time last year (next week) was the JPMorgan Chase Open, if I'm not mistaken, which she didn't play.

The JPMorgan Chase points should be coming off, and Toronto's points should be coming off in two weeks.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

QUEEN VEE


Good Luck: RENA, MATTEK, HAYNES, GULLICKSON, HARKLEROAD, RUBIN, GRANVILLE, LEE-WATERS, SCHNYDER, JACKSON, PERRY, KING, SUGIYAMA, PIERCE, TULYAGANOVA, IVANOVIC, KUZNETSOVA, MOLIK, DANIILIDOU, MEDINA GARRIGUES, PETROVA, PENNETTA, GOLOVIN, PEER, LI, SCHIAVONE, RAZZANO, ZVONAREVA, SPREM, SREBOTNIK, VINCI, & SAFINA
Venus Forever is offline  
post #13 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 09:39 PM
country flag CJK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 959
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rachel~
According to my calculations, Amelie could actually become No.1 at Montreal if she reaches the final! This is because JuJu should be down to around 4204 points and Amelie is currently on 4031 points!

ALLEZ AMELIE!!!
How did u come up with 4204 I dont think that's correct.
Amelie will become #1 if she does well in Montreal and Olympics.
CJK is offline  
post #14 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 09:42 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tennisIlove09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 44,073
                     
No offence, but it Mauresmo becomes #1, it will be the biggest joke women's tennis has ever seen. I thought Clijsters was terrible, but at least she had been consistent. Momo, you never know.
tennisIlove09 is offline  
post #15 of 55 (permalink) Old Jul 31st, 2004, 09:47 PM
country flag CJK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 959
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisIlove09
No offence, but it Mauresmo becomes #1, it will be the biggest joke women's tennis has ever seen. I thought Clijsters was terrible, but at least she had been consistent. Momo, you never know.
And let me guess who you think should be #1 in the world.
Kim and Amelie worked so hard to get there, they seize the oppurtunities. Ever wonder why Venus was never ranked #1 in 2000? Because she did nothing. Nothing for the ranking and she thinks the whole ranking is a joke.
And because of that, out of all the #1's in history, she held it for the shortest time.
#1 means a lot. If you dont care, there is no need to diss the others for caring about the rankings.
CJK is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome