Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret. - TennisForum.com
 109Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:45 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,120
                     
Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Well I hope Vickery just wants to play AO and it's nothing serious

good thing is we're just one Bertens win away from a Mertens vs Bertens match
Fulci likes this.

Haas, König, Paszek, Grabher, Garcia, Konjuh, Kulichkova, Arruabarrena, Gavrilova, Puig, Hampton, Putintseva, Kovinic, Konta, Kasatkina
luppy55 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:46 AM
Senior Member
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 180,907
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Sachia called trainer after winning 1st game, had heavy strapping on her calf

Funny thing is Mertens also called trainer but Vickery retired before Mertens could

No Aus Open for Mertens but Vickery has got her medical certificate
TheBoiledEgg is offline  
post #3 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:47 AM
Senior Member
 
Chilenaitor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,770
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBoiledEgg View Post
Sachia called trainer after winning 1st game, had heavy strapping on her calf

Funny thing is Mertens also called trainer but Vickery retired before Mertens could

No Aus Open for Mertens but Vickery has got her medical certificate
Poor Elise

What if she withdraw now?

Chile
Chilenaitor is offline  
post #4 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:48 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22,649
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

So basically this was a match about who could retire first? Such a messy situation.
mckyle. is offline  
post #5 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:49 AM
Senior Member
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 180,907
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilenaitor View Post
Poor Elise

What if she withdraw now?
She cant withdraw now, as she's the one who got the win
TheBoiledEgg is offline  
post #6 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,734
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Elise probably thought she would get to go to AO qualies when she lost the first game but then Sachia quits first
njnetswill is online now  
post #7 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:53 AM
Oh lord, please don't let me be misunderstood
 
porando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,938
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Lol
Serve2Win likes this.

'Time present and time past are both perhaps present in time future'


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario101 View Post
And lets be honest a lot of men who are into WTA are gay
porando is offline  
post #8 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:54 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 7,501
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mckyle. View Post
So basically this was a match about who could retire first? Such a messy situation.
Peak WTA
Povin likes this.
Warrior is offline  
post #9 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:55 AM
Senior Member
 
Territory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northern Territory
Posts: 8,445
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

A race to retire... omg

Hobart is a mess
Serve2Win likes this.

I am not suited to Forum life.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chingching View Post
You are not suited to Forum life.
Territory is offline  
post #10 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 28,967
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Martens can't withdraw now? You win the 2R and you're ineligible to play Melbourne?
Wiggly is offline  
post #11 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 01:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,370
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

It makes sense money-wise if both figure to lose against Bertens. Points-wise, it depends how they rate their chances in the AO Q.
GoDominique is offline  
post #12 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 02:02 AM
O R I O L E S
 
CrossCourt~Rally's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ~Camden Yards~
Posts: 136,900
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mckyle. View Post
So basically this was a match about who could retire first? Such a messy situation.
It seems that way
CrossCourt~Rally is offline  
post #13 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 02:02 AM
Senior Member
 
pedropt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 16,311
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

*ALTERNATIVE THREAD TITLE*

Australian Open QR0: Vickery def. Mertens 1-0 ret.

pedropt is offline  
post #14 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 02:10 AM
Senior Member
 
TopspinDoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 147
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

Can Elise really not WD before Thurs and play in Melbourne?

"A player who has lost in a Tournament (Week 1) may play the
Qualifying for a Tournament scheduled for the next week (Week 2).

A player may not withdraw or retire from any draw of Week 1 to
play in any other Tournament in Week 2. However, if a player is
forced to withdraw or retire from a draw in Week 1 due to medical
reasons, and she is entered in a Tournament in Week 2, that play-
er must receive a medical examination from the Tournament
Physician/PHCP from Week 1 and submit her medical examination
to the Tournament Physician/PHCP for Week 2. To be eligible to
compete in the Week 2 Tournament, the player must receive a med-
ical examination by Tournament Physician and PHCP in Week 2."

The idea of Elise missing the AO is disconcertin', but boy I've been hurtin' for some Mertens/Bertens.
Matmagix likes this.
TopspinDoctor is offline  
post #15 of 109 (permalink) Old Jan 10th, 2017, 02:13 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
danieln1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 23,207
                     
Re: Hobart R2: Mertens def Vickery 0-1 ret.

too mess
danieln1 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome