Where the Roland Garros Seeds Justified?? - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 01:13 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Foot_Fault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Live with my Wife Venus!!
Posts: 8,636
                     
Where the Roland Garros Seeds Justified??

Seed- Player- Status
1 Justine Henin-Hardenne, BelgiumOUT - second round (Garbin)

2 Serena Williams, United StatesAdvanced to quarterfinals

3 Amelie Mauresmo, FranceAdvanced to quarterfinals

4 Venus Williams, United StatesAdvanced to quarterfinals

5 Lindsay Davenport, United StatesOUT - fourth round (Dementieva)

6 Anastasia Myskina, RussiaAdvanced to quarterfinals

7 Jennifer Capriati, United StatesAdvanced to quarterfinals

8 Nadia Petrova, RussiaOUT - third round (Weingartner)

9 Elena Dementieva, RussiaAdvanced to quarterfinals

10 Vera Zvonareva, RussiaOUT - third round (Sharapova)

11 Svetlana Kuznetsova, RussiaOUT - fourth round (Myskina)

12 Ai Sugiyama, JapanOUT - second round (Pascual)

13 Chanda Rubin, United StatesWithdrew (knee injury)

14 Paola Suarez, ArgentinaAdvanced to quarterfinals

15 Sivia Farina Elia, ItalyOUT - second round (Shaughnessy)

16 Patty Schnyder, SwitzerlandOUT - second round (Asagoe)

17 Francesca Schiavone, ItalyOUT - fourth round (Capriati)

18 Maria Sharapova, RussiaAdvanced to quarterfinals

19 Anna Smashnova-Pistolesi, IsraelOUT - third round (Dementieva)

20 Conchita Martinez, SpainOUT - second round (Dulko)

21 Magdalena Maleeva, BulgariaAdvanced to fourth round

22 Karolina Sprem, CroatiaOUT - first round (Casanova)

23 Fabiola Zuluaga, ColumbiaAdvanced to fourth round

24 Jelena Dokic, YugoslaviaOUT - first round (Perebiynis)

25 Elena Bovina, RussiaOUT - third round (Capriati)

26 Nathalie Dechy, FranceOUT - first round (Foretz)

27Eleni Daniilidou, GermanyOUT - first round (Weingartner)

28Lisa Raymond, United StatesOUT - second round (Parra Santonja)

29Petra Mandula, HungaryOUT - second round (Chladkova)

30Mary Pierce, FranceOUT - third round (V. Williams)

31Emilie Loit, FranceOUT - second round (Zheng)

32Dinara Safina, RussiaOUT - second round (Irvin)

NOW TRENDING
#SEETHE
#SerenaSLAM

#YourFaveCouldNEVER
#TWENTYONE
#StillSEETHING
#

Last edited by Foot_Fault; Jun 1st, 2004 at 01:21 AM.
Foot_Fault is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 01:21 AM
Senior Member
 
faboozadoo15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 22,138
                     
well the seeds went by rank except for venus and serena, so yes, they were justified bc venus and serena are in the quarters.

wtg for sharapova! but i think we all had to know petrova wasn't going to repeat
faboozadoo15 is offline  
post #3 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 01:28 AM
Serena's #1 Hater
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 19,714
                     
I say yes. Justine was obviously in no condition to play major tournament tennis, but as the top-ranked player in the world and defending Roland Garros champion, she had to be the top seed. As far as honoring the WTA Tour's Special Seeding Rule for the Williams sisters, I think their play has justified the FFT's decision. The real question is, what about Wimbledon?

"He who finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favor from the Lord." -- Proverbs 18:22

"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard." -- Herb Brooks

"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." -- Muhammad Ali
darrinbaker00 is offline  
post #4 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 01:29 AM
Senior Member
 
faboozadoo15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 22,138
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrinbaker00
The real question is, what about Wimbledon?
same for williams sisters

but sorry, monica will be a top 16 seed
faboozadoo15 is offline  
post #5 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 01:37 AM
Serena's #1 Hater
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 19,714
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by faboozadoo15
same for williams sisters

but sorry, monica will be a top 16 seed
Now for the $10 million question: do you seed Serena and Venus 1-2? I'm not saying they should (althought, admittedly, I wouldn't mind it), but based on recent Wimbledon results, the Lawn Tennis Association of England would have a strong leg to stand on if they did.

"He who finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favor from the Lord." -- Proverbs 18:22

"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard." -- Herb Brooks

"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." -- Muhammad Ali
darrinbaker00 is offline  
post #6 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 02:01 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Foot_Fault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Live with my Wife Venus!!
Posts: 8,636
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrinbaker00
Now for the $10 million question: do you seed Serena and Venus 1-2? I'm not saying they should (althought, admittedly, I wouldn't mind it), but based on recent Wimbledon results, the Lawn Tennis Association of England would have a strong leg to stand on if they did.
I would Venus and Serena deserve the 1 and 2 seeds at Wimby.

NOW TRENDING
#SEETHE
#SerenaSLAM

#YourFaveCouldNEVER
#TWENTYONE
#StillSEETHING
#
Foot_Fault is online now  
post #7 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 02:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrinbaker00
Now for the $10 million question: do you seed Serena and Venus 1-2? I'm not saying they should (althought, admittedly, I wouldn't mind it), but based on recent Wimbledon results, the Lawn Tennis Association of England would have a strong leg to stand on if they did.
Look at the past history of Wimbledon women's seedings... they've only ever screwed with the rankings once (Graf and Davenport, '99) - and it backfired on them.

The RG seedings were justified because they went along with the rankings. This includes Venus and Serena, as they went along with their official WTA injury rankings. No arbitrary past-performance or recent-results criteria at all.
sartrista7 is offline  
post #8 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 02:37 AM
Serena's #1 Hater
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 19,714
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by sartrista7
Look at the past history of Wimbledon women's seedings... they've only ever screwed with the rankings once (Graf and Davenport, '99) - and it backfired on them.

The RG seedings were justified because they went along with the rankings. This includes Venus and Serena, as they went along with their official WTA injury rankings. No arbitrary past-performance or recent-results criteria at all.
You're right about Wimbledon not deviating from the rankings for the women, which they'll probably do again this year, but would they really be out of bounds if they didn't? Because the grass season is so short, past performances mean a whole lot more at Wimbledon than they would at the other three majors. Even Justine herself would be hard-pressed to argue that the Williams sisters aren't the two best grass-court players in the world right now, so why shouldn't the Wimbledon seedings reflect that?

"He who finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favor from the Lord." -- Proverbs 18:22

"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard." -- Herb Brooks

"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." -- Muhammad Ali
darrinbaker00 is offline  
post #9 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 02:41 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,556
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrinbaker00
Now for the $10 million question: do you seed Serena and Venus 1-2? I'm not saying they should (althought, admittedly, I wouldn't mind it), but based on recent Wimbledon results, the Lawn Tennis Association of England would have a strong leg to stand on if they did.
How exactly can you drop the current #1 to the THIRD seed. Especially when she's been a finalist?

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #10 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 02:42 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrinbaker00
You're right about Wimbledon not deviating from the rankings for the women, which they'll probably do again this year, but would they really be out of bounds if they didn't? Because the grass season is so short, past performances mean a whole lot more at Wimbledon than they would at the other three majors. Even Justine herself would be hard-pressed to argue that the Williams sisters aren't the two best grass-court players in the world right now, so why shouldn't the Wimbledon seedings reflect that?
I'm one of those who think that the seedings should just go by the rankings and be done with it... regardless of any other factors, otherwise it just becomes too subjective. Because if you seed Venus and Serena 1 and 2 based on other factors, you've got to apply those same factors to every other seeding place consistently... and you can't do that for 32 women.

I don't approve of special seedings, either... I hated Lindsay's special seeding at the time. The mid-ranked players get totally screwed on them.
sartrista7 is offline  
post #11 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 02:45 AM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 34,770
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volcana
How exactly can you drop the current #1 to the THIRD seed. Especially when she's been a finalist?
When you have two players who've split the last 4 championships and played against each other in the last two finals.
Sam L is offline  
post #12 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 02:48 AM
Senior Member
 
faboozadoo15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 22,138
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrinbaker00
Now for the $10 million question: do you seed Serena and Venus 1-2? I'm not saying they should (althought, admittedly, I wouldn't mind it), but based on recent Wimbledon results, the Lawn Tennis Association of England would have a strong leg to stand on if they did.
wimbledon will be sly... kim will be back. kim will be number 2.
serena 3 and venus 4. we get the williams vs belgium semis that everyone loves and its a perfect tournament. that, my friends is your answer there.
if an all williams final is to be, it shall be. 3 and 4 MUST be on opposite sides of the draw, just like 1 and 2.
faboozadoo15 is offline  
post #13 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 02:58 AM
Senior Member
 
WF4EVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The West Indies
Posts: 2,068
                     
I agree: Justine - 1, Kim - 2, Serena - 3 and Venus - 4. I think this would be quite a fair seeding arrangement for Wimby.
WF4EVER is offline  
post #14 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 03:36 AM
Senior Member
 
alexusjonesfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: inside
Posts: 7,837
                     
Where the what?

They seeded by rankings plus wta ssr...just like any wta event would do...nothing to justify.

future 25+ gs champ alexus "don't you get in mah back seat" jones
alexusjonesfan is offline  
post #15 of 27 (permalink) Old Jun 1st, 2004, 03:40 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Martian Willow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Below the stars.
Posts: 6,695
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by viggen
Where the what?
...hell do you keep hiding...?
Martian Willow is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome