How much LESS significant is a surface on women's tour then on men's? - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old May 1st, 2004, 10:02 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wherever Maggie goes.
Posts: 3,293
                     
How much LESS significant is a surface on women's tour then on men's?

Venus is supposedly averse to playing on clay apart from carpet, isn't she? Yet, she won her first title in more then a year on clay and is in a winning streak.
Only a few players like Maggie are one court wonders. But when you look at ATP, there are so many certain surface specialists, especially Spaniards on clay. For Linday clay may not be her best surface but still manages to demolish most of the field on it.
GoGoMaggie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old May 1st, 2004, 10:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Aerien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: At the Fugue
Posts: 4,840
                     
I read an article in TENNIS magazine before in our school library (They had an archive of it). They were analyzing the 1995/96 season and why the same players seemed to be in the second week of the French Open and Wimbledon, particularly Arantxa and Steffi.
Bottomline was, women played the same style of game no matter what the surface was, that's why you kept seeing the same players more often than not reaching the later stages of tournaments as opposed to the men's tour.

They also asked Arantxa how she adjusted from clay to grass. She said that when the grass season comes, she usually gets a serving coach to help her with serving since it was the biggest factor on grass.

Since September 2002:
33 singles titles
33 doubles titles
7 mixed doubles titles
7 Fed Cup titles

Debut record: 14 out of 24
Retired: Oct. 23, 2006
Aerien is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old May 1st, 2004, 12:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Mr_Molik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,571
                     
because all the women play basically the baseline style of same, with a few exceptions
in mens tennis u have serve-vollyers, all rounders and baseliners

Go the Aussies

Sophie Ferguson ~ Casey Dellacqua ~ Samantha Stosur ~ Jessica Moore ~ Christina Wheeler ~ Monique Adamczak ~
Mr_Molik is offline  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old May 1st, 2004, 01:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,498
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussieboy88
because all the women play basically the baseline style of same, with a few exceptions
in mens tennis u have serve-vollyers, all rounders and baseliners
Gotta disagree with you there, because even when the women's game HAD players with wildly varying style, the situation was still that a very few players at the top dominating on all surfaces.

The talent on the women's side is very vertical. There's a small group of players who's better than everyone else, and so much better they overcome the surface. The last eight GS tournaments have has the same four finalists. No one else is breaking though at all.

The talent on the men's side is flatter. By that I mean #30 is closer to #3 than theose same two rankings on the women's tour. Also, because the men can put so much more spin on the ball, they can exaggerate the differences in the surface.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.

Last edited by Volcana; May 1st, 2004 at 01:10 PM.
Volcana is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old May 1st, 2004, 01:59 PM
Senior Member
 
tennnisfannn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,308
                     
Surface doesn't seem to make a big difference in the women's tour. The same good players can play on virtually anything.

Rena- a tennis great! 22 at striking distance.
tennnisfannn is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old May 1st, 2004, 02:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,898
                     
that's the biggest reason - the men's tour is much deeper with strong players, so a detail like the court surface can make a big difference. In women's, the best players are that much better than the others, so they win no matter what the surface. Also the women tend to all play the same style (flat baseline groundstrokes) reducing the importance of surface. You cannot really say that Maleeva is an indoor specialist, either. How many indoor tournies has she won in the past seven years? Only one, Moscow '02, if i remember right. It's not like Maggie's results have been always great indoors and always terrible on other surfaces. I'd say she is an all surface player. The defining thing about Maggie's career is that she has always performed badly at the Grand Slams - none of which are indoors, true, but i don't think that's the reason she hasn't done well. It's more of a character issue - some players handle the pressure of GS tennis better than others.
vogus is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome