Tennis Forum banner

PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra "Period" Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

19K views 179 replies 142 participants last post by  MrTrick 
#1 ·
PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra "Period" Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

Bageled TWICE. By SHELBY ROGERS.


This scoreline :hysteric:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHA


Who the fuck gets bageled by Shelby Rogers? :hysteric: (Edit: Apparently 60uchard :tears:)

Shelby absolutely spanked that ass in every single way. More aces, more winners, less errors. I couldn't believe my eyes when watching Rogers drag Petra from side to side, painting the lines, with Petra still barking away in vain :hysteric:

To think I was deluded enough into thinking Petra would reach R4 :oh:.

There's always Wimbledon :worship:
 
See less See more
#105 ·
Re: PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

A bagel sandwich? :spit:... I don't even like Kvitova and I feel sorry for you Kvitova fans, that's bloody embarrassing.
To be quite fair...Petra should be challenging for 3 out of the 4 slams yearly. I don't quite understand her. She is so Devistatingly LETHAL when in full flight. Her not being able to be consistent there HURTS ME TO THE CORE. Motivation maybe?

I want her to figure it out before it's too late....She's in my Top 5 and this was embarrassing. Kudos to Shelby for showing me something about her game this entire week.
 
#5 ·
Re: PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

AHAAHAAHAHAAH

:haha:

Wasn't it Kvitova who double bagelled Anci a few years ago after losing a first set? :lol:
 
#8 ·
Re: PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

Bageled TWICE. By SHELBY ROGERS.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHA


Who the fuck gets bageled by Shelby Rogers? :hysteric:

Shelby absolutely spanked that ass in every single way. More aces, more winners, less errors. I couldn't believe my eyes when watching Rogers drag Petra from side to side, painting the lines, with Petra still barking away in vain :hysteric:

To think I was deluded enough into thinking Petra would reach R4 :oh:.

There's always Wimbledon :worship:
Bouchard :oh: twice as well.
 
#13 ·
Re: PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

Peak WTA :help:

Petra... :confused:
 
#17 ·
Re: PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

Bageled TWICE. By SHELBY ROGERS.


This scoreline :hysteric:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHA


Who the fuck gets bageled by Shelby Rogers? :hysteric:

Shelby absolutely spanked that ass in every single way. More aces, more winners, less errors. I couldn't believe my eyes when watching Rogers drag Petra from side to side, painting the lines, with Petra still barking away in vain :hysteric:

To think I was deluded enough into thinking Petra would reach R4 :oh:.

There's always Wimbledon :worship:
Your 2nd favourite wta player 60chard.
 
#19 ·
Re: PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

Kvitova sure doesn't like playing Americans in the 3rd of Majors....Hampton, Riske and Rogers.....4 bagels and a breadstick lol.
 
#20 ·
Re: PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

What it is about Shelby and giving bagel sandwiches to "top" players? :lol:
 
#24 ·
Re: PEAK Roland Garros R3: Shelby Rogers def. [10] Petra Kvitova 6-0 6-7(3) 6-0

Bageled TWICE. By SHELBY ROGERS.
[]


Who the fuck gets bageled by Shelby Rogers? :hysteric:

Shelby absolutely spanked that ass in every single way. More aces, more winners, less errors. I couldn't believe my eyes when watching Rogers drag Petra from side to side, painting the lines, \
:sad: I wish I could argue that. But it's fact. Kvitova got beat down . . by Shelby Rogers. :eek:
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top