Isn't it amazing how a person may make a comment about a player, be it commentator, some tennis reporter or even a member on this board and suddenly it becomes gospel truth. I will begin with kim, the impression I get on this board these last few days is people think she is dumb, has no variety, no strategy and that all she does is get the ball back. This is simply not true
. Anyone who is objective (non fans) can see this. Losing a match to a better player on the day does not demean a player. Kim is an amazing player and very few players can get past her. I think she has tonnes of variety, if anyone thinks Amelie and justine have variety so does kim. I also happen to think her niceness has become a bit of a myth too
Well the girl has been judged way too harshly. I know she made a mistake at the FO (cameras don't lie), but does she have to be judged by that single moment. At the AO final, McEnroe said that match had had alot of drama and all Justine needed to do was take some injury timeout. Again the time outs way too exaggerated.
Like Justine, too much is expected of her, she is also judged very harshly.
Anyone else want to add more of what you consider a myth regarding your favs or none favs.