Rating OZ 2004 - TennisForum.com

View Poll Results: OZ 2004 was.....
The tournament was great! 14 29.79%
It was okay, but I won't be buying the video 15 31.91%
Sucked 18 38.30%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 12:48 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,671
                     
Rating OZ 2004

I keep hearing people complain about this tournament, and I really don't understand why. Sure it would have been nice if Serena had played, but think of all the slams Monica missed (17 out of 56 - 28%) and Steffi missed (14 out of 68 - 20%). Yet there were some great slams with out them. The quality of what's on the court is the issue, not who plays.

Certainly, the OZ would have been better for ME if Venus hadn't withdrawn lost (isn't denial insidious ), but given the number of fans around here who hate everything Williams, that should have made then HAPPIER about the tournament.

I wouldn't call this a GREAT tournament. But it was a good one. The quality of play was pretty good (not great) the 2nd week, and we got to see some players that we Americans rarely get to see.

So how would you rate the tournament overall?

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:04 PM
Diosa Contable
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lancaster, UK
Posts: 2,945
                     
I am a fan of Lisa Raymond.

Enough said


Gallofa is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
I wouldn't say that the quality of play was good, let alone great, at any point; the best matches I saw were Mauresmo v Molik, Myskina v Rubin and Raymond v Williams, which speaks volumes (only one three-setter in that lot!).

The trouble is, women's tennis has stagnated; it's become stale and predictable. Previously, the top players would cruise through the early rounds but redeem the game with some cracking rivalries, but at the moment there are no meaningful rivalries at the top of the game. Davenport v Henin-Hardenne should have been a classic: a former No 1 and past champion battling for a last chance of glory against the upstart who's usurped her. Instead, it was dreadful - and predictably so. When I say that Davenport will continue to come up woefully short in the biggest matches and fail to win another Slam, I'd quite like it if she proved me wrong, but she proves me right again and again. Ditto with Capriati. And the fact that those two are still clogging up the top 5 when they are no threats whatsoever to win a Slam says it all about the rest.

It's also frustrating to see so many matches being decided on a) injuries and b) nerves. I'm sorry, but it's a professional athlete's job to keep herself healthy and mentally strong, and the fact that just ONE woman managed both at the AO is quite embarrassing.

And compare this situation to the men's game - in the past, the men's game has also suffered from a lack of rivalries (top players rarely playing each other etc), too much surface specialism and too much under-performing, but it's looking very healthy at the moment. To be honest, the women's game just feels like it's waiting around for either the Williams sisters to be healthy and commit fully (shyeah right on both counts) so they can have some proper rivalries with Justine, or for players like Sharapova and Golovin to grow up (which will take a few years yet).
sartrista7 is offline  
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:39 PM
Senior Member
 
hingis-seles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,161
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by sartrista7
I wouldn't say that the quality of play was good, let alone great, at any point; the best matches I saw were Mauresmo v Molik, Myskina v Rubin and Raymond v Williams, which speaks volumes (only one three-setter in that lot!).

The trouble is, women's tennis has stagnated; it's become stale and predictable. Previously, the top players would cruise through the early rounds but redeem the game with some cracking rivalries, but at the moment there are no meaningful rivalries at the top of the game. Davenport v Henin-Hardenne should have been a classic: a former No 1 and past champion battling for a last chance of glory against the upstart who's usurped her. Instead, it was dreadful - and predictably so. When I say that Davenport will continue to come up woefully short in the biggest matches and fail to win another Slam, I'd quite like it if she proved me wrong, but she proves me right again and again. Ditto with Capriati. And the fact that those two are still clogging up the top 5 when they are no threats whatsoever to win a Slam says it all about the rest.

It's also frustrating to see so many matches being decided on a) injuries and b) nerves. I'm sorry, but it's a professional athlete's job to keep herself healthy and mentally strong, and the fact that just ONE woman managed both at the AO is quite embarrassing.

And compare this situation to the men's game - in the past, the men's game has also suffered from a lack of rivalries (top players rarely playing each other etc), too much surface specialism and too much under-performing, but it's looking very healthy at the moment. To be honest, the women's game just feels like it's waiting around for either the Williams sisters to be healthy and commit fully (shyeah right on both counts) so they can have some proper rivalries with Justine, or for players like Sharapova and Golovin to grow up (which will take a few years yet).

FUCK YOU, SEWTA.
[/SIZE]
hingis-seles is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:41 PM
Raj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 347
                     
sartrista7. Hey i think you summed it up perfectly!

Although the AO was not all that great, the final was still good if only Kim had won. LOL

But your right the tour really needs healthy and fully fit players such as Serena, Venus, Capriati etc right now.

Exciting Rivalries at the moment........ only one i can think of is Kim V Justine.
Raj is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:41 PM
country flag SJW
Senior Member
 
SJW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Allez
Posts: 11,016
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by sartrista7
To be honest, the women's game just feels like it's waiting around for either the Williams sisters to be healthy and commit fully (shyeah right on both counts)
that did happen...

but i don't think you liked the outcome
SJW is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raj
Exciting Rivalries at the moment........ only one i can think of is Kim V Justine.
That's the worst rivalry ever! It's so predictable (ditto Serena v Venus). And for me, the only thing which could have made AO any worse would have been Kim winning - Justine's triumph was the silver lining

Sarah - I meant, of course, that I'm waiting for Vee to be healthy and commit to kicking her pesky little sister's ass from here to Hollywood
sartrista7 is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:48 PM
country flag SJW
Senior Member
 
SJW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Allez
Posts: 11,016
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by sartrista7
Sarah - I meant, of course, that I'm waiting for Vee to be healthy and commit to kicking her pesky little sister's ass from here to Hollywood
i know that...i just wanted you to admit it

so i guess if Venus had won those five slams, the rivalry would have been your cup of tea huh?
SJW is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
Nah... I love Justine while Kim is possibly my least favourite player, but I'm still getting bored by the all-Belgian non-rivalry. I just want to see a match where I have no idea beforehand who the victor will be.
sartrista7 is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:55 PM
country flag MLF
Senior Member
 
MLF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,287
                     
I think the tournament was quite depressing. Obviously I always enjoy slam tennis but this event was someone's big chance to step up there, one of the players on the fringes of the top 6 - 8 i.e the likes of Myskina, Rubin, Dementieva, even Sugiyama or lower down a player like a Bovina. Yet none of them had the balls or belief to step up and grab an opportunity in the big time ( I'm talking semis or better here ). With Davenport capitulating in the quarters tamely all this event did was reinforce that the only true contenders for finals day at the slams are the Belgians, the Williams sisters and possibly Capriati.
MLF is offline  
post #11 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 01:55 PM
country flag SJW
Senior Member
 
SJW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Allez
Posts: 11,016
                     
so who would you pick out of these?

Venus-Justine
Venus-Kim
Serena-Justine
Serena-Kim

?

they've all been predictable (bar Berlin 01, 02 and Hamburg 02...[i knew Serena would be beaten by Justine on clay...just didn't expect the straight sets in charleston])
SJW is offline  
post #12 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 02:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
Depends on the surface, though I think the greater point is that these, potentailly the best rivalries, are not happening at the moment because the Williams sisters have stopped being healthy (Venus) and committing fully (Serena). As I said... either Williams vs Justine could be a great, unpredictable match. Kim loses vs Venus or Serena in all scenarios though.

David is on the money re: the lower-ranked players, the Nastya match was depressing for that very reason - she had a golden opportunity to take her career to that next level and just proved that she wasn't up to it
sartrista7 is offline  
post #13 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 05:08 PM
Tart with a Heart
 
JonBcn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 15,737
                     
Can I just say that I'm happy that it sucked, as I was on holiday and couldnt see any of it?

~ gonna teach you tricks that'll blow your mongrel mind ~
JonBcn is offline  
post #14 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 05:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,389
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by sartrista7
I wouldn't say that the quality of play was good, let alone great, at any point; the best matches I saw were Mauresmo v Molik, Myskina v Rubin and Raymond v Williams, which speaks volumes (only one three-setter in that lot!).

The trouble is, women's tennis has stagnated; it's become stale and predictable. Previously, the top players would cruise through the early rounds but redeem the game with some cracking rivalries, but at the moment there are no meaningful rivalries at the top of the game. Davenport v Henin-Hardenne should have been a classic: a former No 1 and past champion battling for a last chance of glory against the upstart who's usurped her. Instead, it was dreadful - and predictably so. When I say that Davenport will continue to come up woefully short in the biggest matches and fail to win another Slam, I'd quite like it if she proved me wrong, but she proves me right again and again. Ditto with Capriati. And the fact that those two are still clogging up the top 5 when they are no threats whatsoever to win a Slam says it all about the rest.

It's also frustrating to see so many matches being decided on a) injuries and b) nerves. I'm sorry, but it's a professional athlete's job to keep herself healthy and mentally strong, and the fact that just ONE woman managed both at the AO is quite embarrassing.

And compare this situation to the men's game - in the past, the men's game has also suffered from a lack of rivalries (top players rarely playing each other etc), too much surface specialism and too much under-performing, but it's looking very healthy at the moment. To be honest, the women's game just feels like it's waiting around for either the Williams sisters to be healthy and commit fully (shyeah right on both counts) so they can have some proper rivalries with Justine, or for players like Sharapova and Golovin to grow up (which will take a few years yet).
i definately agree, tennis was alot better pre-2002 when Hingis, Venus, Serena, Seles, Davenport, Capriati and the bunch all gave 100%

its really getting stale
CJ07 is offline  
post #15 of 15 (permalink) Old Feb 8th, 2004, 08:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Belgium = Best's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,217
                     
It was OK, but it sucks that Kim lost again

I pressed the wrong button. I picked vote no.1

Aya, mate!

GO BELGIAN BABES!!!!!
Especially Kim

Sandrine Van Handenhoven

Go to www.sandrinesite.tk

Belgium = Best is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome