I don't like Roger! Maybe it's because I am American and tend to favor the American players over others. However; The talent of Roger is ridiculous! He's the only person in the mens game who can execute every shot in the book! Amazing!! The comparison to Pete is justified, but if Roger can continue like this, I think that he will be better than Pete, and it will not require winning 10 wimbledon titles. Justine is a great player, but the only thing she has in common with Steffi is that they both hit with a one-handed backhand. Steffi was able to be efective with that backhand on "all surfaces" against the top players. Justine's backhand is only effective against the top players on clay, and only because clay allows her more time to set up for each shot!!! Steffi was an all-courter, Justine is not. The comparison to Steffi is at best stupid. Nice try though!! I love how prematurely a players get thrown up there with the greatests of all time. No one is buying it though. I can think of 5 players who's backhands are better than Justine's.Venus and Lindsay to name a few, and when she is on MoMo will out hit Justine in a backhand rally. Just because her backhand is "beautiful" to watch, does not make it a great one!! Roger deserves every ounce of credit that he gets, but I wonder how long it will take before people start hating him because he "wins too much" !!??
".. IF U WANT TO BE PROFOUND! IF U REALLY NEED TO JUSTIFY! TAKE A BREATH AND LOOK AROUND..A LOT OF FOLKS DESERVE TO DIE!!"-AUDREY II