On Doubles Seeding (Williams2x) - TennisForum.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old Sep 2nd, 2012, 11:17 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,872
On Doubles Seeding (Williams2x)

I would not wish to penalize the teams that played doubles week-in and week-out. They deserve their seeding. But not seeding Williams2x leaves some possiblities that are difficult. it hasn't mattered this slam.

Facing the #15 seed in the round-of-32 is more than fair. But that could have as easily been the #1 seed in the 1st round. No advantage to a superteam that doesn't play 'regular season' doubles, but how about a rule that a tournament, at it's discretion, could say such and such a team couldn't face a seed in the first round. And no seed higher than #17 in the second round.

Okay, I re-read that paragraph, and it beomes 'My niece won't face a seed in the opening round, even though she can't play a lick'.

So that idea is bogus. And in fact, maybe the tournaments are handling it the best way possible. As I said, it's more than fine at this tournament. But if Azarenka and Greater Radwanska decided to play doubles at the slams 'to keep their volleying tuned,' they could upset the seeding almost as badly as the Willies do.

You might recall, ten years or so ago, Hingis and Seles teamed up and beat Williams2x. There aren't two players near that good outside of V&S on tour right now, but the theory is sound.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old Sep 5th, 2012, 08:57 AM
Senior Member
Globetrotter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 519
Re: On Doubles Seeding (Williams2x)

I really think Williams, quite simply, should have been seeded (any other system seems too complicate to me). At Wimbledon, organizers somtimes showed some discretionality in the past (in singles), giving higher seeds to players who did well in the past (I remember Novotna, Serena). Why the cannot do it for doubles? Williams playing unseeded is simply not right, and it can turn out to be really unfair for the other teams too. In the end, luck counts too much while making the draw... Errani/Vinci or Huber/Raymond could have faced Williams in first round! If the purpose of the "seeding" is to avoid possible finals in round 1 or 2, I think Williams should be seeded when playing together, no matter what the raking says. At least something like 8th seed: lower than their "real" value, but higher than what the rankings say.
Globetrotter is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old Sep 7th, 2012, 12:22 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
Babolatpro880's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,727
Re: On Doubles Seeding (Williams2x)

Also, there is no such thing as a 17th seed in a doubles grand slam unless someone pulls out.
Babolatpro880 is online now  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome