Originally Posted by Avram Bakalina
yeah but I still think that its a marketing issue
Maybe when PAW Fed Cup is coming there should be a post at the beginning of the regular PAW threads or something ... PMs to all PAWers is ... too hard , maybe we should think about something
Ok, this shouldn't be a problem!
also @archer and Youf: Yes, we should make the rules sticky. But before, we should think of the system. Keeping it as it is now or has anyone other ideas? Right now, there is following modus:
2 players - average value.
3 players - average value.
4 players - average value of best three players.
5 players - average value of best four players.
Am I right?
I don't know how to change it but in principal I agree that there should be some advantage for bigger teams as it should encourage people in participating!
Another question, we have to deal with: Late change of picks! In this case, this can be a problem as SUPPs are involved:
E.g. you have PAW01 .... PAW16 and SUPP01..SUPP10. Then someone realizes that he's got a high point SUPP01(or SUPP08 etc)! But as all regular picks seems to be played, he could try to change one of the original picks to some match which will be unlikely to be played to get his SUPP into the calculations... understandable?
So, in this case we need to have clear rules!