Week 1 Ranking New - Page 7 - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #91 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2014, 10:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Amalgamate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,827
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
Alma- I trust you...

The Gators face 6 of 8 ranked teams, after Indoors, but the next 8 games doesn't appear to be against any ranked teams.
True. After the Alabama/Auburn matches it doesn't look like Florida will play any teams that will be in their countable wins except maybe Vanderbilt. Then of course the SEC tournament again where they could pick up wins against highly ranked TAMU, Alabama, or UGA.

The PAC-12 is hurt by not having a team championship at the end of the season.

Serena Williams
Victoria Azarenka Venus Williams
Sloane Stephens Christina McHale
Amalgamate is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2014, 10:09 PM
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,497
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amalgamate View Post
True. After the Alabama/Auburn matches it doesn't look like Florida will play any teams that will be in their countable wins except maybe Vanderbilt. Then of course the SEC tournament again where they could pick up wins against highly ranked TAMU, Alabama, or UGA.

The PAC-12 is hurt by not having a team championship at the end of the season.
This may result in grouping the PAC-12 teams in one section of the draw in NCAA's...
tie_breaker is offline  
post #93 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2014, 10:12 PM
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,497
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
This may result in grouping the PAC-12 teams in one section of the draw in NCAA's...
Should that happen, I can't expect Stanford to repeat last year's run

But anything is possible!
tie_breaker is offline  
 
post #94 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2014, 10:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,142
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
This may result in grouping the PAC-12 teams in one section of the draw in NCAA's...
This seems to be a down year for the Pac-12 (as far as the rankings go) so UCLA and Stanford may not move much in the rankings. Is that a correct assessment?
slickshoes510 is offline  
post #95 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2014, 10:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Amalgamate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,827
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by slickshoes510 View Post
This seems to be a down year for the Pac-12 (as far as the rankings go) so UCLA and Stanford may not move much in the rankings. Is that a correct assessment?
Cal will move up next week since they have a win over now #3 Georgia, but you're right there aren't a lot of remaining opportunities for the PAC-12 to get more matches. Both UCLA and Stanford play each other, USC, and Cal one more time. Unlike the ACC and SEC, there isn't a PAC-12 championship tournament which provides an opportunity to get additional wins.

Serena Williams
Victoria Azarenka Venus Williams
Sloane Stephens Christina McHale
Amalgamate is offline  
post #96 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2014, 10:42 PM
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,497
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

2007-2008 was the last year that Stanford played USC/UCLA/Cal twice a year.

Since then Stanford plays Cal twice a year, but USC/UCLA only once. I remember that was discussed once, but the more I think about it, what's the point of having a strong Pac-12 division and only having to play once against them? Might help the rankings some...
tie_breaker is offline  
post #97 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2014, 10:48 PM
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,497
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
2007-2008 was the last year that Stanford played USC/UCLA/Cal twice a year.

Since then Stanford plays Cal twice a year, but USC/UCLA only once. I remember that was discussed once, but the more I think about it, what's the point of having a strong Pac-12 division and only having to play once against them? Might help the rankings some...
On the other hand, Cal has been playing everybody twice (Stan/UCLA/USC) so they have the best chance of ranking high, but not so being the 3rd/4th best team in the conference...
tie_breaker is offline  
post #98 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2014, 10:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Amalgamate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,827
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
2007-2008 was the last year that Stanford played USC/UCLA/Cal twice a year.

Since then Stanford plays Cal twice a year, but USC/UCLA only once. I remember that was discussed once, but the more I think about it, what's the point of having a strong Pac-12 division and only having to play once against them? Might help the rankings some...
It might be because there are more teams in the Pac-12 now then there were several years ago, and you are required to play a certain number of times. But as I've said before, the Pac-12 is definitely hurt by being the only conference (I think?) to have an individual tournament at the end of the season and not a team tournament. Whereas teams in the SEC and ACC have chances to play schools in the regular season and get more wins in the conference tournament, Stanford doesn't have that opportunity. You only count your top 10 wins going in to NCAA's so one, two, or three extra wins over highly ranked teams helps significantly. (E.g. if Georgia got additional wins in the SEC tournament over Florida, TAMU, and Alabama or Duke getting wins over UVA and UNC).

Also: there are typically more mid-ranked teams in the ACC and SEC than in the Pac-12. Teams like Miami, Clemson, Georgia Tech, Notre Dame aren't threatening to win the ACC's but all typically have top 25 rankings unlike Oregon, Colorado, Washington St.

Serena Williams
Victoria Azarenka Venus Williams
Sloane Stephens Christina McHale
Amalgamate is offline  
post #99 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 20th, 2014, 12:27 AM
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,249
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amalgamate View Post
Also: there are typically more mid-ranked teams in the ACC and SEC than in the Pac-12. Teams like Miami, Clemson, Georgia Tech, Notre Dame aren't threatening to win the ACC's but all typically have top 25 rankings unlike Oregon, Colorado, Washington St.
Weird comparison.

Top 25 teams;

ACC 6
SEC 6
PAC12 5

Were it not for the weird 'expansions' (TAM & UND), the # will be the same 5 for all 3 conferences.

I would understand if you compared those ACC teams to ASU, Utah, Arizona
& Washington and argue that those 4 ACC teams are better, but..

About Ojai, I'd rather watch Davidson vs Doyle than watch ANOTHER USC vs UCLA match(that'll be 3, not counting countless individual matches during the Slams and Regional) If it negatively affects team rankings compared to other conferences, so be it (besides, it might have a beneficial effect in individual rankings, no?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
2007-2008 was the last year that Stanford played USC/UCLA/Cal twice a year.

Since then Stanford plays Cal twice a year, but USC/UCLA only once. I remember that was discussed once, but the more I think about it, what's the point of having a strong Pac-12 division and only having to play once against them? Might help the rankings some...
That's the thing we always wonder, since Cal is still playing So. Cal teams twice.

Really, you can't complain about Stanford being underranked when they

1. Don't play USC/UCLA more
2. Play UF
3. Skip Indoors

Last edited by fantic; Mar 20th, 2014 at 03:52 AM.
fantic is offline  
post #100 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 20th, 2014, 06:03 AM
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,248
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
2007-2008 was the last year that Stanford played USC/UCLA/Cal twice a year.

Since then Stanford plays Cal twice a year, but USC/UCLA only once. I remember that was discussed once, but the more I think about it, what's the point of having a strong Pac-12 division and only having to play once against them? Might help the rankings some...
Not that it matters, but in 2009-2010 Stanford was scheduled to play both So Cal team for home and away, but one of the USC matches was rained out.

For 2010-2011 there was also home and away for UCLA and Stanford.

But I think its just big state geography that adds a complexity to the ranking points chase for the top pac 12 teams. There are not that many teams within 1,000 kilometers that have ranking that will add meaningful points. Form and Gouci, we hope to see your teams ranked in the 25 to 45 area.
2nd_serve is offline  
post #101 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 21st, 2014, 05:19 AM
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,497
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

I was impressed by St. Mary's.

Especially a player like Jullien, who's practically beaten everybody on the Stanford line-up.
tie_breaker is offline  
post #102 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 25th, 2014, 09:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,142
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

New rankings are out.

Rank Average Team Previous Week
1 72.42 Duke University 1
2 70.21 UCLA 2
3 69.62 University of Virginia 6
4 67.26 University of Florida 5
5 66.68 Stanford 4
6 66.49 University of Alabama 8
7 64.55 Texas A&M University 7
8 64.34 North Carolina 10
9 63.04 University of Georgia 3
10 61.82 Vanderbilt University 11
11 61.52 Northwestern University 9
12 55.39 University of Southern California 12
13 55.38 California 16
14 53.13 University of Miami (Florida) 13
15 45.19 University of Michigan 15
16 44.90 Baylor University 14
17 42.46 Clemson University 18
18 38.65 University of Oklahoma 17
19 33.80 Arizona State University 25
20 33.51 Auburn University 20
slickshoes510 is offline  
post #103 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 25th, 2014, 10:36 PM
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,497
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Massey Ratings thru 23-March:


Rank Team Record
1 Stanford 10-0
2 UCLA 15-1
3 Duke 15-1
4 Georgia 13-3
5 Florida 13-4
6 Alabama 15-2
7 North Carolina 15-3
8 Virginia 12-4
9 Texas A&M 13-3
10 California 10-4
11 Miami FL 14-2
12 Vanderbilt 14-4
13 Northwestern 8-3
14 Michigan 10-3
15 USC 10-4
16 Clemson 14-3
17 Baylor 11-6
18 Oklahoma 11-3
19 Arizona St 16-2
20 Arizona 14-1
tie_breaker is offline  
post #104 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 25th, 2014, 10:49 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
desariofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 916
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

UF went up to #4??? girl...
desariofan is offline  
post #105 of 173 (permalink) Old Mar 25th, 2014, 11:15 PM
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,248
                     
Re: Week 1 Ranking New

Quote:
Originally Posted by desariofan View Post
UF went up to #4??? girl...
how we love to second guess the rankings.
2nd_serve is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome