Ranking 2012-3 - Page 6 - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #76 of 217 (permalink) Old Feb 27th, 2013, 05:18 AM Thread Starter
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

pretty meaningless team ranking today
fantic is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #77 of 217 (permalink) Old Feb 27th, 2013, 05:20 AM
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,269
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by knoxt View Post
Stanford fell to #26 and UVA fell to #48.. wow - has Stanford ever fallen this low?
I really doubt that they've fallen below top 15, probably since the early 80's
tie_breaker is offline  
post #78 of 217 (permalink) Old Feb 28th, 2013, 05:41 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 1,293
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Two top ten teams already fell more than 20 positions after five matches...
knoxt is offline  
post #79 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 5th, 2013, 08:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,494
 
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Appalachian State. Yay for Ellie.
Radical is online now  
post #80 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 5th, 2013, 11:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,028
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Embittered View Post
Appalachian State. Yay for Ellie.


This is perhaps the worst team to ever be ranked. They should not even be in the top 150. I am a little baffled as to how it could even happen looking at their results, but I guess some of the teams they beat must have been in the unpublished 76-125 range last week.

3/3/2013 at Samford University Win 4-3
3/1/2013 Chattanooga Win 4-2
2/24/2013 at Presbyterian College Win 7-0
2/23/2013 East Tennessee State University Loss 6-1
2/18/2013 at Charlotte Win 4-3
2/17/2013 North Carolina Central University Win 6-1
2/9/2013 Radford University Win 7-0
1/27/2013 Liberty University Win 6-1
1/26/2013 George Mason University Win 7-0
1/19/2013 at East Carolina University Loss 4-3
1/18/2013 at North Carolina A&T State Win 7-0
CTSEMT is offline  
post #81 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 2013, 07:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,494
 
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Mountaineers Earn First Ranking in Program History
whatever the naysayers may think
Radical is online now  
post #82 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 7th, 2013, 04:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 1,293
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Someone tell me how Duke still stayed at No.2 despite loss to Michigan?
knoxt is offline  
post #83 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 7th, 2013, 05:03 AM
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,269
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Who would have thought that there would be only one Pac-12 team in the top 10 and two in the top 17
tie_breaker is offline  
post #84 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 7th, 2013, 02:31 PM Thread Starter
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
Who would have thought that there would be only one Pac-12 team in the top 10 and two in the top 17
It's a conspiracy
fantic is offline  
post #85 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 7th, 2013, 03:05 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3
 
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Is the ITA a nonprofit? Why are the rankings so bad and why do they not fix them?
SweatySteve is offline  
post #86 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 10th, 2013, 12:16 PM
Senior Member
 
gouci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,111
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Many posters here are saying the ITA rankings are a joke and wonder why it's so inaccurate. What is REALLY A JOKE about the ITA computer rankings are the unrecorded match results.

For example let's take UC Davis official results on the ITA website.

1. 1/19/13 loss at Arizona 6-1 (recorded twice in error)
2. 2/15/13 win at Sac. St. 4-3 (says scheduled, score not officially recorded yet)
3. 2/16/13 loss at San Francisco 3-4 (says scheduled, score not officially recorded yet)
4. 3/2/13 win vs Cal Poly 5-2 (says scheduled, score not officially recorded yet)
5. 3/3/13 wins vs #66 San Jose St. 4-3 (says scheduled, score not officially recorded yet)

- If you're the ITA how do you allow matches that were played 1 month ago not to officially be recorded for their computer to go towards the rankings?

- If there are all these unrecorded results & mistakes for 1 neglectful team you can bet the number of these errors are multiplied by a hundred fold through out the system.

- The ITA needs to create a program that raises a red flag for a match scheduled days in the past with no scores recorded yet. And one that raises a red flag for duplicate results entered.

- Maybe the loss to UC Davis should lower #66 San Jose St.'s ranking or knock them out of the rankings all together but since the score wasn't officially recorded for the ITA computer San Jose St.'s ranking is inaccurate. The worst part is all these unrecorded scores pile up and makes the entire rankings inaccurate for everyone else.

- If you're the UC Davis head coach and tennis is your lively hood, how the hell do you allow the computer to not credit you with 3 wins and add an extra loss on your official record. The Davis head coach is responsible for the accuracy of his team's record and comes across as a slacker not on top of things or even worse incompetent.
gouci is offline  
post #87 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 12th, 2013, 09:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,494
 
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Rankings all published, but I've only looked at the first page of the team. TAMU up to no. 3.

http://www.itatennis.com/AwardsAndRa..._-_Mar__12.htm
http://www.itatennis.com/AwardsAndRa..._-_Mar__12.htm
http://www.itatennis.com/AwardsAndRa..._-_Mar__12.htm
Radical is online now  
post #88 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 13th, 2013, 12:05 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 265
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

ASU gets ranked 18 and Cako jumps to 21st. If you guys look at recent results on the ITA website you can actually see full doubles rankings! All three doubles teams from ASU are in the top 75! Plus Nicole Gibbs jumps to 22 an I checked and they finally took the "loss" against the girl from Washington.

David Jaime
davidjaime is offline  
post #89 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 19th, 2013, 10:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,494
 
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Rankings are out. Florida up, Duke sliding, some of the well-known names that found themselves a long way down the rankings made big gains.

BTW, for comparison, the Texas College Tennis blogger posted his rankings yesterday. (Similar scheme, slightly less insane, and isn't afraid to list every team.)
Radical is online now  
post #90 of 217 (permalink) Old Mar 20th, 2013, 01:00 AM Thread Starter
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Embittered View Post
Rankings are out. Florida up, Duke sliding, some of the well-known names that found themselves a long way down the rankings made big gains.

BTW, for comparison, the Texas College Tennis blogger posted his rankings yesterday. (Similar scheme, slightly less insane, and isn't afraid to list every team.)
Rank School Record Rating

1 Texas A&M 13-1 1132.15
2 North Carolina 14-1 1132.08
3 Florida 11-2 1113.79
4 USC 14-2 1078.68
5 UCLA 11-2 1078.43
6 Georgia 11-2 1078.32
7 Cal 8-4 1039.02
8 Michigan 9-3 1038.86
9 Duke 9-3 1024.03
10 Alabama 13-1 1016
11 Stanford 8-2 1000.33
12 Nebraska 14-2 937.69
13 Northwestern 7-5 937.68
14 Miami (Florida) 8-3 937.6
15 Clemson 6-5 937.24
16 TCU 11-1 930.12
17 Vanderbilt 11-6 929.64
18 Purdue 9-1 926.97
19 Notre Dame 10-5 926.65
20 Arizona State 12-1 916.72
21 Auburn 14-2 916.44
22 Georgia Tech 6-6 901.6
23 Texas Tech 10-4 901.47
24 Baylor 7-10 901.35
25 Florida State 9-4 901.28
26 Texas 6-7 893.87
27 UC Irvine 13-3 875.94
28 San Diego 5-6 864.18
29 Tennessee 5-6 857.19
30 Virginia 6-6 837.99
31 Yale 10-2 837.63
fantic is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome