Order of Strength Discussion - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 95 (permalink) Old Jan 31st, 2011, 03:31 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,248
                     
Order of Strength Discussion

It seems like we love to argue about order of strength, possible stacking. When Tennisace open a lineup violation thread, it got a lot of posts about order of strength speculation. I [propose we separate those two themes. Cut and dry lineup violation where a player is moved more than one lineup spot between matches, and arguments that the order of strength is suspect.
2nd_serve is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 95 (permalink) Old Jan 31st, 2011, 03:49 PM
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

stacking is rife this season
fantic is offline  
post #3 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 12:28 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Independent Isle
Posts: 7,027
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

I agree that Duke is talented and very deep however there seems to be something fishy going on and injury doesn't seem to be a factor:

Versus Hawaii the line-up was:
1. Fahoum
2. Zslinszka
3. Clayton
4. Plotkin
5. Mar
6. Gorny

with Nze and Kahan TBA.

Versus William and Mary Nze and Kahan are in the line-up and Clayton sits out:
1. Fahoum
2. Zslinszka
3. Plotkin
4. Nze
5. Kahan
6. Mar

This tells us that the order is roughly:
1. Fahoum
2. Zslinszka
3. Clayton
4. Plotkin
5. Nze
6. Kahan
7. Mar
8. Gorny

Clayton is No. 3 because she is ahead of Plotkin in the Hawaii match.

Versus Brown the line-up was:
1. Zslinszka
2. Plotkin
3. Nze
4. Kahan
5. Clayton
6. Gorny

Here comes the major shift in the order:
1. Fahoum
2. Zslinszka
3. Plotkin
4. Nze
5. Kahan
6. Clayton
7. Mar
8. Gorny

And then in their last match against Texas A&M, Clayton sits out and the line-up above remains intact. Essentially she moved down three spots from where she originally started. The thing with line-ups is that they are supposed to be ordered in terms of ability and you are not suppose to tamper with the line-up due to injury. If someone is coming back from an injury, you can't place them lower in the order of strength. In others words, the order of strength is always determined by if everyone was at 100%. Sure you could argue that Plotkin, Nze, Clayton, and Kahan are evenly matched and could replace each other at any position...but really that is just a convenient way of saying I can place them in any order I choose...I will acknowledge the possibility that the other three girls just got a lot better in the last three weeks...but how can anyone really prove that?

Last edited by Tennisace; Feb 1st, 2011 at 12:34 AM.
Tennisace is offline  
post #4 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 12:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Independent Isle
Posts: 7,027
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

Just so I can demonstrate that I can remain impartial...while Cal never had an obvious issue with the line-up last year, I will say that Siwosz had no business playing No. 4 ahead of Goransson and Davis. That clearly was a move to help win at No. 5 and No. 6. A lot of teams do such actions, but that by no means makes it okay.

Lindsay Burdette at No. 2 for Stanford last year was another example in my opinion of "sacrificial lamb."
Tennisace is offline  
post #5 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 02:40 AM
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tennisace View Post
Just so I can demonstrate that I can remain impartial...while Cal never had an obvious issue with the line-up last year, I will say that Siwosz had no business playing No. 4 ahead of Goransson and Davis. That clearly was a move to help win at No. 5 and No. 6. A lot of teams do such actions, but that by no means makes it okay.

Lindsay Burdette at No. 2 for Stanford last year was another example in my opinion of "sacrificial lamb."
And Lindsay fully satisfied the 'expectation' by taking out Mathews and Will to help the team win the title Now THAT's a winner, everyone De facto MVP of the tourney!

Kinda similar to Hickey and Byron, I guess.
fantic is offline  
post #6 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 03:00 AM
Senior Member
 
Amalgamate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,853
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

Ellah was playing #1 for Duke last year

Serena Williams
Victoria Azarenka Venus Williams
Sloane Stephens Christina McHale
Amalgamate is offline  
post #7 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 03:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Independent Isle
Posts: 7,027
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by fantic View Post
And Lindsay fully satisfied the 'expectation' by taking out Mathews and Will to help the team win the title Now THAT's a winner, everyone De facto MVP of the tourney!

Kinda similar to Hickey and Byron, I guess.
Yes, but she was 14-11 at No. 2 in duals, while her sister at No. 3 was 16-2 and at No. 4 was 8-0. If that's not a little weird than I don't know what is.
Tennisace is offline  
post #8 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 03:43 AM
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

yeah, who knew Lindsay would score a home run at the most decisive moment.
fantic is offline  
post #9 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 03:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Independent Isle
Posts: 7,027
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

The problem really though is that the rules say that you are suppose to order your players in "order of strength" but this quote from the Cal coach with regard to line-ups sums the lack of enforcement on this rule and the overall sentiment coaches have:

"It's so early in the season. I think that's something probably over the next month or month and a half we'll be looking at," she said. "I think we'll just have to see who's most effective where."
Tennisace is offline  
post #10 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 12:46 PM
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

that's what I was talking about on the other thread
fantic is offline  
post #11 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 1st, 2011, 07:48 PM
Senior Member
 
gouci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,111
                     
Pepperdine

Doubles
1. Issara/Zalameda (PEPP) def. Coupez/Maja Sujica (USD) 8-3
2. Colffer/Moore (PEPP) vs. Claus/Escalona (USD) 5-7, Susp.
3. Bhargava/Oates (PEPP) def. Depenau/Hoffpauir (USD) 8-5
Pepperdine Wins Doubles Point

Singles
1. Stephanie Hoffpauir (USD) def. Marie Zalameda (PEPP) 6-0, 6-4
2. Anamika Bhargava (PEPP) def. Laura Claus (USD) 3-6, 6-4, 6-2
3. Khunpak Issara (PEPP) def. Josymar Escalona (USD) 4-6, 6-1, 6-2
4. Arianna Colffer (PEPP) def. Juliette Coupez (USD) 6-2, 6-2
5. Anna Depenau (USD) def. Andrea Oates (PEPP) 6-3, 3-6, 6-2
6. Marite Raygada (USD) def. Megan Moore (PEPP) 6-3, 6-1


Pepperdine playing Marie Zalameda at #1 pays off as #43 Pepperdine def. #67 San Diego 4-3.

Is 1 fall 3 set win against Ali Walters enough to justify Zalameda at #1? Zalameda has not won a set playing #1 singles but Pepperdine has gone 4 for 4 at #2 & #3 singles in the ITA Indoors.

Is Ali Walters injured or has bad grades?

How many matches will Ale Granillo be ineligible for?
gouci is offline  
post #12 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 2nd, 2011, 12:49 AM
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

4. Arianna Colffer (PEPP) def. Juliette Coupez (USD) 6-2, 6-2
5. Anna Depenau (USD) def. Andrea Oates (PEPP) 6-3, 3-6, 6-2
6. Marite Raygada (USD) def. Megan Moore (PEPP) 6-3, 6-1

fantic is offline  
post #13 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 2nd, 2011, 12:50 AM
Le Conte's Sparrow
 
fantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,255
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

Actually I'm suspicious of BOTH teams, Coupez has no biz in playing a mere #4
But that result, ouch. You guys know that it's a match between former #1s

Last edited by fantic; Feb 2nd, 2011 at 08:56 AM.
fantic is offline  
post #14 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 2nd, 2011, 04:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 405
                     
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tennisace View Post
The problem really though is that the rules say that you are suppose to order your players in "order of strength" but this quote from the Cal coach with regard to line-ups sums the lack of enforcement on this rule and the overall sentiment coaches have:

"It's so early in the season. I think that's something probably over the next month or month and a half we'll be looking at," she said. "I think we'll just have to see who's most effective where."
There are reasons coaches sometimes drops a player down in the lineup. The most obvious is the player having a slight injury or just coming back from an injury after being out of the lineup for a while. If thats the case, I dont see any problem with it.
johnnytennis is offline  
post #15 of 95 (permalink) Old Feb 6th, 2011, 03:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,204
 
Re: Order of Strength Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by fantic View Post
stacking is rife this season
Some unglamorous examples, involving, it pains me to say, British players.

Liz Ullathorne isn't setting the world on fire as Texas Tech's number 1. And yesterday Houston were (you can read that as "was", if you like) surprisingly competitive against Rice, in part because Dionne Sanders at number 1 pushed the rest of the team down.
Radical is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome