Tie-breaker rule change poll
Some players have expressed their opinion about the need for change of a rule regarding solving of ties, stating that comparing by time of the final post (who was quicker) is not the most fair way to solve close situations.
That is why I'm proposing this change and asking you to vote. Would you like this rule to remain the same, or should we change it in a way that we don't only post the number of games for the final match, but also for the two semifinals.
In case of a tie, we would compare the two players number of games for each of the semifinals and see; first, who's closer guess was better, and if they're still tied, who's weaker guess was better.
Player 1: Henin 20 games, V. Williams 28 games
Player 2: Henin 26 games, V. Williiams 24 games
Let's assume Henin wins in 22, and Venus in 27 games. Player one's closer guess was that for Venus' match, because he/she missed it by just one game. Player two's closer guess was also for Venus' match. So we compare who's closer guess was better, and we see that player one wins.
However if they'd be tied even after that, we'd compare who was better with the other guess, and see that player one would again win the tie-breaker, cause his weaker guess missed the result by two, and the other player's missed by 6 games.
This should be enough to solve ties, so please vote and tell me what do you think about this.